Case Number: ADJ-00001200. Workplace Relations Commission

CourtWorkplace Relations Commission
Docket NumberADJ-00001200
Date06 May 2015
PartiesA Worker v An Employer

In accordance with Section 41(4) of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015, and Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Act, 1967 and following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint

The Respondent was requested to confirm the legal name of the Employer. This was confirmed as named at Hearings on 11th October 2016. However at further Hearings on 12th October 2016 one of the Complainants present presented a letter dated 6th May 2015 from a different named respondent. Following further discussion with the Respondent she confirmed the correct name of the Respondents is as stated above under Parties/Respondent.


The Complainant was employed from 21st September 2005 until the employment terminated on 31st August 2015. The Complainant was paid €346.00 gross per week and she worked 40 hours a week. The Complainant was provided with a written statement of her Terms and Conditions of Employment. The Complainant had transferred from another named Company under TUPE in April 2011

The Complainant referred a complaint to the Workplace Relations Commission on 20th December 2015 alleging she had not been paid her Redundancy entitlements on termination of her employment.

Summary of Complainant’s Position.

The Complainant was employment as a General Operative by the Respondent Company and assigned to work with a Client Company (Named) at their Premises located in Airport Industrial Estate since 4th April 2011. She had transferred to the Respondent under TUPE.

In August 2015 she was informed that she was no longer to be assigned to the Client Company as this Client had entered into a new Contract with another named Company who would be relocating the operations of the Client Company to a location in Naas, Co Kildare.

She was informed by email dated 7th August 2015 – copy provided – that if she was to transfer under TUPE to a named Transferee and relocate to Naas, Co Kildare that she would have to sign a new terms and conditions in line with their contracts of employment – that she would have continuous service.

The Complainant stated that she lived in Dublin City and was not in a position to transfer and relocate to Naas, Co Kildare.

The Complainant was issued with a letter dated 14th September 2015 which confirmed as follows: I wish to confirm (named) has finished assignment with our client, as of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT