Clery & Company (1941) Ltd v O'Donnell
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1944 |
| Date | 01 January 1944 |
| Court | High Court |
(H.C.),
Ltd
and
O'Donnell
Schoolmistress - Married woman -Instalment of salary actually due - Practice -Procedure.
The Court appointed a receiver over an instalment of salary which had accrued due to a national schoolmistress, who was a married woman and who owed a debt payable out of her separate estate. When it is sought to appoint a receiver over an instalment of salary, the proper procedure is to apply to the Court on notice and not ex parte. Clery & Co. (1941)
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
ACC Loan Management v Rickard
...to pension benefits should be made on notice. ( Campbell v. Usher [1913] 47 ILTR 165). So, too, with salaries. ( Clery v. O'Donnell [1944] 78 ILTR 190). The procedure is slightly different in the Circuit Court. (See, on this, Collins ‘Enforcement of Judgments’, Round Hall, 2014, Chap. 12).......
-
O'Connell v an Bord Pleanála
...which have already accrued due and which have not as yet been paid over to a defendant. See the decision in Cleary v. O'Donnell [1944] 78 ILTR. 190. In exceptional circumstances, however, this rule has been relaxed, and counsel for the plaintiff has referred me to the decision in Orr v. Gri......
-
Ahern v Michael O'Brien & Company Ltd
...cause were shown by the debtor to the contrary before the date specified in the said order: ~Clery & Co. (1944) Ltd. v. O'Donnell~ 78 I.L.T.R. 190, ~Orr v. Grierson~ 28 L.R. Ir. 20 and ~Coen v. Ruddy~ [1905] 2 I.R. 56 considered - (1984/559 - O'Hanlon J. - 8/5/89) - [1991] 1 I.R. 421 |Aher......