Colreavy v Colreavy and Keenan [High Court.]
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | High Court |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1940 |
| Date | 01 January 1940 |
(H.C.),
Colreavy
and
Colreavy and Keenan
- Transfer by registered owner whose registration was fraudulently procured - Validity of transfer - Whether transfer voluntary or for valuable consideration - Covenant by transferee to support and maintain transferor for life - Transferee registered as owner - Claim by purchaser under prior unregistered deed for amendment of register - Whether register should be amended - Local Registration of Title (Ir.) Act, 1891 (54 55 Vict. c. 66), ss. 34, 35, 36, 44.
By a deed of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Carroll v Carroll
...V RAY-GER LTD UNREP COSTELLO 28.4.1983 1983/11/3316 JOHNSON V BUTRESS 1936 56 CLR 113 HANBURY MODERN EQUITY 9ED 652 COLREAVY V COLREAVY 1940 IR 71 EVANS V LLEWELLIN 1 COX EQ CAS 333 PRIDEAUX V LONSDALE 1 DE G J & S 433 EVERITT V EVERITT 10 EQ 405 LONGMATE V LEDGER 2 GIFF 157 ANDERSON V ELSW......
-
Grealish v Murphy
... ... the facts - Undue influence alleged - Jurisdiction of Court of Equity to set aside deed when parties do not meet on ... community; in fact I think he treated him as a man of high intelligence. Taking his client to be a competent judge of ... The deed here was in law a transaction for value: Colreavy v. Colreavy (2) ;however tenuous the value may have proved ... ...
-
Allied Irish Banks Ltd v Glynn
...4 De G.F. & J. 208. 3 (1880) 15 Ch. D. 639. 4 (1887) 21 L.R. Ir. 283. 5 [1895] 1 I.R. 146. 6 [1900] 1 I.R. 219. 7 [1924] 1 I.R. 141. 8 [1940] I.R. 71. 9 (1913) 48 I.L.T.R. 10 (1875) L.R. 7 H.L. 496. 11 [1940] I.R. 382. 12 [1928] I.R. 479. 13 See p. 189, ante. 14 [1965] A.C. 1175. 15 (1861) ......
-
Nyland v Brennan
...of "his infirmity and the infirmity may take various forms. "The Deed here was in law a transaction for value, "Colreavy .v. Colreavy 1940 IR.71, however tenuous the "value may have proved to be in fact and, of course, a "Court must be very much slower to undo a transaction "for value; but ......
Get Started for Free
