DPP v McNeill
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judge | Denham J.,Mr. Justice Fennelly,O'Donnell J. |
| Judgment Date | 08 April 2011 |
| Neutral Citation | [2011] IESC 12 |
| Date | 08 April 2011 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Docket Number | [S.C. No. 375 of |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
32 cases
-
DPP v S.A.
...the impugned material; (iv) the evidence adduced was clearly relevant and necessary in terms of the test in The People (DPP) v McNeill [2011] IESC 12; (v) the refusal to withdraw the case in terms of the principles in R v Galbraith [1981] 1 WLR 1039 and POC v The DPP [2000] 3 IR 87 was a le......
-
DPP v Shannon
...state of the law in that regard in this jurisdiction. Rather, following the decision of the Supreme Court in The People (DPP) v McNeill [2011] 2 I.R. 669 there is now considerable doubt as to whether a balancing test is the appropriate one. In that regard, in Evidence (2nd Edition, 2014, Ro......
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Brady
...respondent sought to make clear to the trial court that he was seeking, in reliance on the principles in the Supreme Court case of People (DPP) v. McNeill [2011] 2 I.R. 669 to place the controversial material in question before the jury as relevant background 80 Counsel for the respondent ......
-
The People (at the suit of the DPP) v Clement Limen
...probative force could arise from some circumstance other than similarity. 117 In The Director of Public Prosecutions v. McNeill [2011] IESC 12, [2011] 2 I.R. 669 (“ McNeill”), a decision of this Court, the single complainant had alleged that the accused had subjected her to prolonged and ......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Reform of the Exclusionary rule in Relation to Evidence of Bad Character and Misconduct Evidence
...When extrinsic matters are introduced, the likelihood is that these issues 17 Ibid , at 605 18 [2001] 4 I.R. at 16 19 Ibid , at 31 20 [2011] I.E.S.C. 12 21 Ibid , at para.27 04 Kennedy.indd 101 29/05/2014 10:50 102 shane kennedy will delect some of the jury’s attention from its ultimate det......