Duffy v Lovegrove
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1956 |
| Date | 01 January 1956 |
| Court | High Court |
Duffy
and
Lovegrove
Notice of intention to prosecute - Sufficiency -Place at which offences alleged to have been committed described as "Stillorgan Road, Dublin"- "Stillorgan Road, Dublin" found to have a minimum length of one mile and a quarter - Road Traffic Act, 1933 (No. 11 of 1933), s. 55, sub-s.2 (b).
L. was charged in the District Court in respect of alleged offences against the Road Traffic Act, 1933, ss. 50 and 51. Such alleged offences did not involve a collision between L's motor car and...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
1 cases
-
DPP v Colfer
...674 DPP V WINSTON UNREP O'HANLON 25.5.1992 1992/6/1935 DUGGAN, STATE V EVANS 1978 ILRT 61 FAHY, AG V BRUEN 1937 IR 166 DUFFY V LOVEGROVE 1956 IR 82 YOUNG V DAY 123 LGR 317 ROAD TRAFFIC ACT 1961 S49(2) ROAD TRAFFIC ACT 1961 S49(6)(a) ROAD TRAFFIC ACT 1994 S10 ROAD TRAFFIC ACT 1995 DE BLACAM ......