Duffy v Lovegrove

JurisdictionIreland
Judgment Date01 January 1956
Date01 January 1956
CourtHigh Court
Duffy
and
Lovegrove

Notice of intention to prosecute - Sufficiency -Place at which offences alleged to have been committed described as "Stillorgan Road, Dublin"- "Stillorgan Road, Dublin" found to have a minimum length of one mile and a quarter - Road Traffic Act, 1933 (No. 11 of 1933), s. 55, sub-s.2 (b).

L. was charged in the District Court in respect of alleged offences against the Road Traffic Act, 1933, ss. 50 and 51. Such alleged offences did not involve a collision between L's motor car and any person or other vehicle. A notice of intention to prosecute, which had been duly served on L., gave a brief statement of the alleged offences which it set out as having been committed "at Stillorgan Road, Dublin,"The District Justice found as facts that "Stillorgan Road" (of which "Stillorgan Road, Dublin" formed part) was four miles in length, and that "Stillorgan Road, Dublin" was at least one mile and a quarter in length, but could not determine the exact length of "Stillorgan Road, Dublin." It appeared from the evidence of the complainant that the place of the alleged commission of the offences could have been described more particularly by reference to a house and to an intersecting road. It was contended on behalf of L. that the notice served on...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • DPP v Colfer
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 9 February 1998
    ...674 DPP V WINSTON UNREP O'HANLON 25.5.1992 1992/6/1935 DUGGAN, STATE V EVANS 1978 ILRT 61 FAHY, AG V BRUEN 1937 IR 166 DUFFY V LOVEGROVE 1956 IR 82 YOUNG V DAY 123 LGR 317 ROAD TRAFFIC ACT 1961 S49(2) ROAD TRAFFIC ACT 1961 S49(6)(a) ROAD TRAFFIC ACT 1994 S10 ROAD TRAFFIC ACT 1995 DE BLACAM ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT