Dunnes Stores v Revenue Commissioners
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judge | Mr. Justice John MacMenamin |
Judgment Date | 04 June 2019 |
Neutral Citation | [2019] IESC 50 |
Docket Number | Appeal No: 66/2012,[S.C. No. 66 of 2012] |
Court | Supreme Court |
Date | 04 June 2019 |
AND
[2019] IESC 50
Appeal No: 66/2012
THE SUPREME COURT
Statutory provision – Legislative clarity – Public policy – Appellant seeking the Supreme Court’s interpretation of legislation – Whether some statutory provision is so unclear in its wording, or confusingly cross-referenced to other statutes, amendments, or statutory instruments, as not to possess the defining indicia of the law itself
Facts: MacMenamin J agreed with the judgment and order proposed in an appeal to the Supreme Court. However, he wanted to add a few observations. He held that the legislation which the court had been asked to interpret was drafted in an overly complex way. While he considered that the legislative intent was discernible as explained in McKechnie J’s judgment, the process of detailed consideration which the court had to give to the levy regime implicitly posed a question which may well have to be considered in another case; that question was as to whether some statutory provision, which in the future may fall for consideration by a court, is so unclear in its wording, or confusingly cross-referenced to other statutes, amendments, or statutory instruments, as not to possess the defining indicia of the law itself.
Held by MacMenamin J that neither public policy, nor benign purposes should stand in the way of legislative clarity.
MacMenamin J held that the appeal should be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
I agree with the judgment and order proposed in this appeal. However, I would like to add a few observations.
The legislation which the court has been asked to interpret in this appeal is drafted in an overly complex way. The effect of the provisions upon which reliance is placed may, potentially, expose the appellants to a considerable financial liability, perhaps running into millions of Euro. While I consider the legislative intent is discernible as explained in McKechnie J.'s comprehensive judgment, the process of detailed consideration which the court has had to give to the levy regime implicitly poses a question which may well have to be considered in another case. That question is as to whether some statutory provision, which in the future may fall for consideration by a court, is so unclear in its wording, or confusingly cross-referenced to other statutes, amendments, or statutory instruments, as not to possess the defining indicia of the law itself.
Under Article 40.3.1. of the Constitution, the State guarantees in its laws to respect and as far as practicable by its laws to defend and vindicate the personal rights of the citizen. Article 40.3.2 provides the State shall in particular by its laws protect as best it may from unjust attack and, in the case of injustice done, vindicate the life, person, good name and property rights of every citizen. The term “ law” is used many times in the Constitution in terms which resonate with the ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Tomás Heneghan v The Minister for Housing, Planning and Local Government, the Government of Ireland, the Attorney General and Ireland
...a taxing statute are interpreted today without regard to their overall context and object (see Dunnes Stores v. The Revenue Commissioners [2019] IESC 50, [2020] 3 IR 480 and Bookfinders Ltd. v. The Revenue Commissioners [2020] IESC 62 . It is not hard to find fragments in the case law favou......
-
Used Cars Importers Ireland Ltd v Minister for Finance
...I do not see that this affects the essential inquiry in this case. In construing such an Act in Dunnes Stores v. Revenue Commissioners [2019] IESC 50 (at para. 63) McKechnie J. observed ‘context is critical: both immediate and proximate, certainly within the Act as a whole, but in some circ......
-
Galvin v The Director of Public Prosecutions and Another
... ... that he was acting in his capacity as an Authorised Officer of the Revenue Commissioners, within the meaning of s. 858 of the Taxes Consolidation ... in Dunnes Stores v. Revenue Commissioners [2020] 3 I.R. 480 to widen the ... ...
- M v The Minister for Foreign Affairs