Exham v Beamish
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judgment Date | 28 November 1939 |
Date | 28 November 1939 |
Court | High Court |
- Voluntary settlement -Freehold lands settled by husband and wife -Settlers tenants for life - Provision for children and grandchildren - Period for ascertaining class - Whether limitations for grandchildren void for remoteness - Admissibility of after events to determine remoteness under powers of appointment -Admissibility of evidence as to the age of childbearing -How far judicial decisions in Ireland before the Treaty and English decisions which were followed are now binding upon the Court.
Freehold land was settled by a husband and wife by a voluntary deed unto and to the use of them (the settlors) and their assigns during their joint lives and after the decease of either of them to the use of the survivor during his or her life, and after the decease of the survivor upon trust by demised sale or on mortgage of the settled hereditaments to raise and levy the sum of £7,000 for their younger children, and, subject thereto, to the use of their eldest son for life with remainder to his son or sons as he should appoint, with remainder to the use of their second son for life with remainder to his son or sons in like manner, with remainder to the use of their two daughters, equally, as tenants in common and of their assigns during their lives, and after the decease of either of them to the use of the child, if but one, or of the children equally share and share alike, and of his, her or their heirs as tenants in common if more than one of such of them the said two daughters as should first happen to die, until the day of the decease of the survivor of the said two daughters, but if there should be no such children, or there being such, they should all happen to die under the age of 21...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hoey v Minister for Justice
...1851 (ADAPTATION) ORDER 1992 SI 193/92 COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT 1924 QUINN & WHITE V STOKES & QUIRKE 1931 IR 558 EXHAM & ORS V BEAMISH & ORS 1939 IR 336 DPP, PEOPLE V BELL & ORS 1969 IR 24 CASSIDY V MIN FOR INDUSTRY & COMMERCE 1978 IR 297 EAST DONEGAL CO-OPERATIVE LIVESTOCK MART LTD & ORS V......
-
Irish Shell Ltd v Elm Motors Ltd
...Educational Company of Ireland Ltd. v. Fitzpatrick (No. 2) [1961] I.R. 345. 21 Gaffney v. Gaffney [1975] I.R. 133. 22 Exham v. Beamish [1939] I.R. 336. 23 Boylan v. Dublin Corporation [1949] I.R. 60. 24 Minister for Finance v. O'Brien [1949] I.R. 91. 25 Attorney General v. Ryan's Car Hire L......
-
Attorney General v Simpson
...(1) 345 U. S. 1. (2) [1926] I. P. 456. (3) [1942] A. C. 624. (4) [1953] 2 Q. B. 135. (5) [1955] P. 190. (6) Crimes Act Cases 244. (7) [1939] I. R. 336 (1) Crimes Act Cases 244. (2) [1938] Ir. Jur. Rep. 8. (1) Crimes Act Cases 244. (1) Crimes Act Cases 244. (2) [1938] Ir. Jur. Rep. 8. (1) Cr......
-
People (Attorney General) v Bell
...I.R. 110, 119. 23 [1959] 1 W.L.R. 1090. 24 [1959] 1 W.L.R. 1091. 25 [1959] 1 W.L.R. 1091. 26 (1831) Hayes 204. 27 [1906] 2 I.R. 357. 28 [1939] I.R. 336, 348-9. 29 [1965] I.R. 70, 87, 30 [1946] I.R. 110. 31 [1939] I.R. 21. 32 (1876) 2 Q.B.D. 43. 33 (1876) 2 Q.B.D. 37. 34 [1931] I.R. 558. 35 ......
-
Bearing a Constitutional Cross: Examining Blasphemy and the Judicial Role in Corway v. Independent Newspapers
...[1917] AC 406. 25 On this debate generally see Byrne and McCutcheon, The Irish Legal System (3 d Ed., Butterworths, 1996), at 346-353. 26 [1939] IR 336. 27 [1949] IR 60. 28 [1941] IR 91. 29 State (Quinn) v. Ryan [1965] IR 110; Attorney General v. Ryan's Car Hire [1965] IR 642. See Byrne and......
-
George Gavan Duffy
...a matter of practice, we constantly refer to judgments in the English Courts and such 37[1951] I.R. 1 at 15-18. 38[1951] I.R. 1 at 34. 39[1939] I.R. 336. 2002] George Gavan Duffy judgments, as every lawyer will recognise, have often proved to be of great service to us; but let us be clear. ......