Fowler v Fowler. Dodwell v The Attorney-General. Dodwell v Fowler

JurisdictionIreland
Judgment Date15 January 1866
Date15 January 1866
CourtRolls Court (Ireland)

FOWLER
and

FOWLER.

DODWELL
and

THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL.

DODWELL
and

FOWLER.

Rolls.

Staunton v. StauntonUNK 15 Ir. Ch. Rep. 464.

Gould v. BarnesENR 3 Taunt. 504.

Williams v. BryantENR 5 M. & W. 447.

Rex v. BillinghurstENR 3 M. & S. 250.

Reidy v. PierceUNK 11 Ir. Ch. Rep. 361.

Stultz's case 4 D. M. & Gor. 404.

Baggett v. MeuxENR 1 Ph. 627.

Com. Dig., Condition O. Sarel's TrustsUNK 10 Jur. 876.

Baker v. Brady 7 D. M. & Gor. 507.

Shaw v. PerkinUNK 1 Dowl., N. S. 306.

Mitchenson v. CarterENR 8 T. R. 57.

Ex parte Domville 14 Ir. Chan. Rep. 19.

CHANCERY REPORTS. 507 1865. Rolls FOWLER v. FOWLER. DODWELL v. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL. DODWELL v. FOWLER. Dec. 4. 1866. Jan. 15. Ax order was made in these causes and matters, on the 25th of June A judgment was obtained 1860, whereby it wag' amongst other things ordered, that the re- against M. F. ona promis- ceiver, during the life of James Crofton Dodwell, should pay the sory note signed M. balance on foot of each of his accounts, to the persons and in the E, „dy was registered as a P in the said order mentioned-i.e., three sixty-fifth parts mortgage, un- of said balances to Mary Byrne during her natural life, and nine der the 13 and 14 Vic., c. 29, ainst M. F. sixty-fifth parts to the Crown, or to such person as her Majesty The real name might depute to receive the same. of the defend ant was M. B., By letters patent from the Crown, dated the 17th of October and she was so named in a 1861, an annuity of £52. 13s. was granted out of the said nine Crown grant. and in certain sixty-fifth parts to Henry Tobias Peyton, to hold to him and his Chancery pro ceedings; but heirs during the life of the said Mary Byrne, on the trusts therein she had passed bythe surname mentioned ; that is to say, that he was to pay the said annuity of F., having cohabited with " into the hands of the said Mary Byrne alone, her executors or a man of that administrators, and that she is not to have the power of depriving name. Held, that herself thereof, or of any part thereof, either by sale, mortgage, or the judgment was duly re anticipation." gistered as a William Clifford Tute obtained a judgment against the said Mary mortgage. The Crown, Byrne, by the name of Mary Fowler, on the 25th of June 1861, by its preroga tive, may an which judgment was registered as a mortgage against the three nex a condi tion against undivided sixty-fifth shares in the said order of the 25th of June alienation to a grant in fee, 1860 mentioned, but it was not registered against the said annuity. An annuity was granted by. the Crown to a trustee, on trust to pay it into the hands of M. B...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Davies v Kennedy, and Others
    • Ireland
    • Rolls Court (Ireland)
    • 12 December 1868
    ...6 Bli. N. S. 1; 2 Dow. & Cl. 460 VOL. III. O'Connor v. StephensUNK 13 Ir. C. L. 63. Brown v. Thorp L. R. 2 Ap. 240. Fowler v. Fowler 16 Ir. Ch. R. 507. In re Edgeworth's Estate 11 Ir. Ch. R. 293. In re Power's Estate 11 Ir. Ch. R. 288, 295. Slator v. Slator 16 Ir. Ch. R. 488. Woodroffe v. G......
  • The Estate of Mathew Flood, Owner; Stanley Carr Joyce, Petitioner
    • Ireland
    • Chancery Division (Ireland)
    • 24 June 1881
    ...THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MATHEW FLOOD,OWNER; STANLEY CARR JOYCE,PETITIONER Eyre v. M'dowellENR 9 H. L. C. 619, 646. Fowler v. Fowler 16 Ir. Ch. R. 507. Hawkins v. Gathercole 6 D. M. & G. 1. Russell v. MooreUNK 8 L. R. Ir. 318. Croft v. LumleyENR 6 H. L. C. 642, 672. Ex parte Domvile, in ......
  • Magner v Johnstone and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court (Irish Free State)
    • 20 April 1926
    ...assets of the firm. Accordingly, I direct an inquiry as to Questions 5 and 6, and I answer Questions 3 and 4 in the affirmative. (1) 16 Ir. Ch. R. 507. (1) [1905] 2 Ch. ...
  • The Estate of Thomas Quirke, Owner; James Quirke, Petitioner
    • Ireland
    • Chancery Division (Ireland)
    • 16 December 1878
    ...IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS QUIRKE,OWNER; JAMES QUIRKE,PETITIONER Kennedy v. WoodsUNKIR I. R. 2 C. L. 436. Fowler v. Fowler 16 Ir. Ch. R. 507. Butler v. SmithUNK 16 Ir. C. L. R. 213. Ex parte Domvile. In re Fowler 14 Ir. Ch. R. 19. Reidy v. PierceUNK 11 Ir. C. L. R. 361. Eyre v. M......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT