G McG v DW and AR (notice party) (No 1)

JurisdictionIreland
Date2000
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • M.E.C. v J.A.C. and J.O.C.
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 9 March 2001
    ... ... APPLICANT AND J.A.C. RESPONDENT J.O.C. NOTICE PARTY AND BY ORDER THE ATTORNEY GENERAL NOTICE PARTY AND IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL SEPARATION AND ... ...
  • M.H. v G.H.
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 26 February 2015
    ... ... Applicant/Appellant And G H Respondent And The Attorney General Notice Party [2015] IESC 7 Appeal No: 8/2010 THE SUPREME COURT Family – Marriage – Divorce – ... ...
  • T. v L
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 9 May 2018
    ... ... the issue of general public importance as follows: ‘While it is correct to state, as was pointed out in the respondent's notice, that this Court has already definitively determined that the relevant foreign divorce cannot be recognised as a matter of Irish private ... established by this Constitution shall be capable of contracting a valid marriage within that jurisdiction during the lifetime of the other party to the marriage so dissolved.’ ... 22 This provision of the Constitution was first considered in the well known case ... ...
  • T(D) v L(F)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 23 November 2001
    ...LAW ACT 1995 S29(1)(D) FAMILY LAW ACT 1995 S29(1)(E) JOYCE V FAGAN 1946 IR 277 RAMSEY V LIVERPOOL ROYAL INFIRMARY 1939 AC 588 MCG V W 2000 ILRM 107 DOMICILE AND RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN DIVORCES ACT 1986 S5 W V W 1993 2 IR 476 DOMICILE AND RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN DIVORCES ACT 1986 S5(1) DOMI......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Around The World In 80 Days: From The Altar To The Courtroom
    • Ireland
    • Cork Online Law Review No. 5-2006, January 2006
    • 1 January 2006
    ...a long term job, property, the purchase of grave plot, banking in the currency of the country. 14[1983] IR 29. 15[1988] ILRM 457. 16[2000] 1 ILRM 107. 17Power C., Case and Comment, [2001] 3 IJFL Here, the petitioner and respondent were wed in Germany but the petitioner had lived in Ireland ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT