G McG v DW and AR (notice party) (No 1)

JurisdictionIreland
CourtHigh Court
Date2000
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • M.E.C. v J.A.C. and J.O.C.
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 9 March 2001
    ...... APPLICANT AND J.A.C. RESPONDENT J.O.C. NOTICE PARTY AND BY ORDER THE ATTORNEY GENERAL NOTICE PARTY AND IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL SEPARATION AND ......
  • M.H. v G.H.
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 26 February 2015
    ...... Applicant/Appellant And G H Respondent And The Attorney General Notice Party Family – Marriage – Divorce – Jurisdiction –English divorce – Recognition of–Family Law (Divorce) Act 1996 ......
  • T. v L
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 9 May 2018
    ...... the issue of general public importance as follows: ‘While it is correct to state, as was pointed out in the respondent's notice, that this Court has already definitively determined that the relevant foreign divorce cannot be recognised as a matter of Irish private ... established by this Constitution shall be capable of contracting a valid marriage within that jurisdiction during the lifetime of the other party to the marriage so dissolved.’ . 22 This provision of the Constitution was first considered in the well known case of ......
  • T(D) v L(F)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 23 November 2001
    ...LAW ACT 1995 S29(1)(D) FAMILY LAW ACT 1995 S29(1)(E) JOYCE V FAGAN 1946 IR 277 RAMSEY V LIVERPOOL ROYAL INFIRMARY 1939 AC 588 MCG V W 2000 ILRM 107 DOMICILE AND RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN DIVORCES ACT 1986 S5 W V W 1993 2 IR 476 DOMICILE AND RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN DIVORCES ACT 1986 S5(1) DOMI......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Around The World In 80 Days: From The Altar To The Courtroom
    • Ireland
    • Cork Online Law Review Nbr. 5-2006, January 2006
    • 1 January 2006
    ...a long term job, property, the purchase of grave plot, banking in the currency of the country. 14[1983] IR 29. 15[1988] ILRM 457. 16[2000] 1 ILRM 107. 17Power C., Case and Comment, [2001] 3 IJFL Here, the petitioner and respondent were wed in Germany but the petitioner had lived in Ireland ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT