Harper Stores Ltd v Commissioner of Valuation
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judgment Date | 05 February 1968 |
Date | 05 February 1968 |
Docket Number | [1965. No. 139 SS.] |
Court | High Court |
Revision - Date when revision must be completed - Premises being reconstructed at date of revision - Occupier - "Actual state" of premises - Potentiality of premises a relevant factor in revision - Poor Relief (Ir.) Act, 1838, s. 124 - Valuation (Ir.) Act, 1852, s. 11 -Local Government (Adaptation of Irish Enactments) Order, 1899, Art. 37(f).
The appellants carried on business in their premises which were being reconstructed, and which had a rateable valuation of £550. In the month of January, 1960, they applied for a revision of that valuation and on the 14th January they vacated the premises to allow the contractors full scope to perform the reconstruction work. The appellants returned to their premises on the 31st March when the work was nearly finished. Being aggrieved at a revised valuation of £350, they appealed to the Circuit Court on the ground that, as the revised valuation must have been completed before the 1st March, the state of the premises at the date of the revision was not such as could justify any assessment for valuation purposes; and they also appealed on the ground that they had not been in beneficial occupation of the premises at the date of the revision. Held by Henchy J., in affirming the decision of the Circuit Court, 1, that the Commissioner of Valuation was obliged to make the revised valuation by...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Slatterys Ltd v Commissioner of Valuation
...(b). The State (Keegan) v. Stardust Compensation Tribunal [1986] I.R 642 distinguished; Harper Stores Ltd. v. Commissioner of Valuation[1968] I.R. 166 followed. Cases mentioned in this report:- Harper Stores Ltd. v. Commissioner of Valuation [1968] I.R. 166. Listowel Urban District Council ......
-
Coillte Teoranta v Commissioner of Valuation
...and used or all that would affect the rent that would be paid by a hypothetical tenant ( Harper Stores Ltd v. Commissioner of Valuation [1968] I.R. 166 at 172). This includes all the advantages and disadvantages, legal and otherwise, attaching to the premises which would affect the mind of ......
-
Wynne v Commissioner of Valuation
...448 SHELBOURNE GREYHOUND STADIUM LTD V CMMSR OF VALUATION UNREP MCGUINESS 22.1.1997 1998/30/12153 HARPER STORES LTD V CMMSR OF VALUATION 1968 IR 166 MARA (INSPECTOR OF TAXES) V HUMMINGBIRD LTD 1982 ILRM 421 EDWARDS V BAIRSTOW 1956 AC 14 ROADSTONE LTD V CMMSR OF VALUATION 1961 IR 239 DUNDALK......
-
VA14.5.669 – Finnegan Menton Ltd
...to the Valuation Tribunal to prepare and forward a Case Stated to the High Court. 9.4 Harper Stores Ltd v Commissioner of Valuation [1968] 1 I.R 166 was he said, the seminal authority governing this case and where he said Henchy J approved the following At page 172 "the use of the words "ac......