Joseph Murphy and Patrick M'Cormack
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 12 April 1930 |
| Date | 12 April 1930 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Irish Free State) |
[S. C., I. F. S.]
In re Murphy and M'Cormack
Judgment mortgage registered prior to registration of transfer to purchaser - Purchaser registered subject to judgment mortgage - Purchaser's equitable rights -Sufficiency of affidavit of judgment - Name of barony omitted - Registration of judgment mortgage inoperative - Judgment Mortgage Act, 1850 (13 14 Vict., c. 29), ss. 6, 7 - Local Registration of Title (Ir.) Act, 1891 (54 55 Vict., c. 66), ss. 21, 36, 44, 45, 49.
G., who was registered under the Local Registration of Title (Ir.) Act, 1891, as full owner of certain lands, sold them to M. on 20th July, 1926. M.'s title was not registered until 4th October, 1926. Meanwhile, on...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
14 cases
-
ACC Bank Plc v Vincent Markham and Mary Casey
... 1994 2 ILRM 68 BELLAMY v SABINE 1857 1 DE G & J 566 GILES v BRADY 1974 IR 462 JUDGMENTS (IRELAND) ACT 1844 S10 MURPHY & MCCORMACK, IN RE 1930 IR 322 STRONG, IN RE 1940 IR 382 REGISTRATION OF TITLE ACT 1964 S71(4) TEMPANY v HYNES 1976 IR 101 Abstract: Land law - Judgment mortgage - Lis p......
-
Mason Hayes and Curran v Queally
...for persons acquiring an interest for value. But a judgment mortgagee has long been held to be a volunteer (see Re Murphy and McCormack [1930] I.R. 322 and Re Strong [1940] I.R. 382). It would seem to me that a volunteer is bound by a lis pendens irrespective of whether he has notice of i......
-
Trinity College Dublin v Kenny
...well established in the authorities: Containercare v. Wycherley and see also Murray v. Diamond [1982] ILRM 113, Re Murphy and McCormack [1930] I.R. 322 and Re Strong [1940] I.R. 382, ACC Bank Plc v. Markham [2005] IEHC 437, [2007] 3 IR 533 and the recent decision of Allen J. in A.D.M. Merse......
-
Dovebid Netherlands Bv v Phlan T/A Phelan Partnership & O'Byrne
...for persons acquiring an interest for value. But a judgment mortgagee has long been held to be a volunteer (see Re: Murphy v. McCormack [1930] I.R. 322 and Re: Strong [1940] I.R. 382). It would seem to me that a volunteer is bound by a lis pendens irrespective of whether he has notice of it......
Get Started for Free