Kavanagh v Ireland

JurisdictionIreland
CourtHigh Court
Judgment Date01 January 1996
Date01 January 1996
(H.C., S.C.)
Kavanagh
and
Ireland

- Attorney General representing to United Nations Committee that preservation of special scheme necessitated by "ongoing campaign related to the problem of Northern Ireland" - Whether representation giving rise to legitimate expectation not to be prosecuted under special scheme for alleged offences not having subversive or paramilitary connection.

Article 38, s. 3, sub-s. 1 of the Constitution of Ireland, 1937, provides as follows:- "Special courts may be established by law for the trial of offences in cases where it may be determined in accordance with such law that the ordinary courts are inadequate to secure the effective administration of justice, and the preservation of public peace and order." Part V of the Offences Against the State Act, 1939, contains provisions relating to special criminal courts. Section 35, sub-s. 2 of the Act of 1939 provides that if the Government "is satisfied that the ordinary courts are inadequate to secure the effective administration of justice and the preservation of public peace and order and that it is therefore necessary that Part V should come into force" it "may" make and publish a proclamation declaring that it is satisfied as aforesaid and ordering that Part V of the Act shall come into force; and sub-s. 3 provides that Part V shall come into force upon the making and publication of such proclamation. Sub-section 4 provides that if, while Part V is in force, the Government is satisfied that the ordinary courts are adequate to secure the effective administration of justice and the preservation of public peace and order, it "shall" make and publish a proclamation declaring that Part V shall cease to be in force. Further, sub-s. 5 provides that it shall be lawful for Dáil Éireann to pass a resolution annulling a proclamation under sub-section 2. By virtue of s. 36, sub-s. 1 of the Act of 1939, if the Government is satisfied that the ordinary courts are inadequate to secure the effective administration of justice and the preservation of public peace and order in relation to particular offences, it may by order declare that such offences are scheduled offences for the purposes of Part V; by virtue of sub-s. 3, the government may by order declare that a scheduled offence shall cease to be a scheduled offence. By virtue of s. 47, sub-s. 1 of the Act of 1939, as amended, a person may be charged with a scheduled offence before the Special Criminal Court and be tried by that court...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
11 cases
  • Curtin v Dáil Éireann
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 9 March 2006
    ... ... - Committees of the Houses of the Oireachtas (Compellability, Privileges and Immunities of Witnesses) Act 1997 (No 17), s 3A - Constitution of Ireland 1937 , Articles 15.10 and 35.4.1 - Relief refused (198 & 203/2005 - SC - 9/3/2006)[2006] IESC 14, [2006] 2 IR 556 ; [2006] 2 ILRM 99 Curtin v ... BOARD v DONNELLY 1939 IR 413 MCDONALD v BORD NA GCON 1965 IR 217 EAST DONEGAL CO-OPERATIVE v AG 1970 IR 317 KAVANAGH v IRELAND 1996 1 IR 321 1996 1 ILRM 133 CONSTITUTION ART 15.10 O'MALLEY v CEANN COMHAIRLE 1997 1 IR 427 CONSTITUTION OF ... ...
  • Horgan v Ireland
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 28 April 2003
    ... ... INTERNATIONAL LAW COMMISSION ARTICLES ON STATE RESPONSIBILITY ART 16 ILC 2001 LOWE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONDUCT OF OTHER STATES JAPANESE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 1–15 2002 O'LAIGHLEIS, RE 1960 IR 93 SUMERS JENNINGS, STATE V FURLONG 1966 IR 183 KAVANAGH V GOVERNOR MOUNTJOY PRISON 2002 2 ILRM 81 CONSTITUTION ART 28.4 MFM V MC 2001 2 IR 385 BYRNE V IRELAND 1972 IR 241 ROBERTS & GUELFF DOCUMENTS ON THE LAW OF WAR 3ED 86 GOODMAN INTERNATIONAL V HAMILTON 1922 2 IR 542 MCGLINCHEY V IRELAND 1988 IR 567 ... ...
  • Dubsky v Ireland
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 13 December 2005
    ... ... ORDER 1973 SI 224/1973 ART 6 AIR NAVIGATION & TRANSPORT ACT 1946 S11(f) AIR NAVIGATION & TRANSPORT ACT 1946 S12(b) CONSTITUTION SAORSTAT EIREANN 1922 CONSTITUTION ART 18.3.1 O LAIGHLEIS, IN RE 1960 IR 93 O'MALLEY v CEANN COMHAIRLE 1997 1 IR 427 KAVANAGH v IRELAND & SPECIAL CRIMINAL COURT & ORS 1996 1 IR 321 1996 1 ILRM 133 CASSIDY v MIN FOR INDUSTRY & COMMERCE 1978 IR 297 RSC O.84 Abstract: Constitutional law – Judicial Review – Ultra Vires – Delay – Whether legal to permit US aircraft overfly the State & ... ...
  • O'Riordan v Maher and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 10 July 2012
  • Get Started for Free