Kelly v National University of Ireland & Director of the Equality Tribunal
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judge | Mr. Justice Hedigan |
| Judgment Date | 09 May 2012 |
| Neutral Citation | [2012] IEHC 169 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [2012] 5 JIC 0901 |
| Date | 09 May 2012 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
Kelly v University College Dublin
...application that she recuse herself ( Patrick Kelly v National University of Ireland, Dublin and The Director of the Equality Authority [2012] IEHC 169 (Unreported, High Court, Hedigan J., 9 May 2012)). The grounds for the application for recusal are not recorded in the judgment. The matter......
-
Vehicle Tech Ltd v Commissioner of an Garda Siochana
...Goode Concrete v CRH plc [2015] 3 I.R. 493; The People (DPP) v Conmey [2012] IECCA 75; Kelly v. National University of Ireland & Anor [2012] IEHC 169: Blehein v St John Of God Hospital & Anor [2001] IESC 73; DD v District Judge Gibbons [2006] IEHC 33; AD v Judge Donagh McDonagh [2009] IEHC ......
-
Sweeney and Another v The Voluntary Health Insurance Board
...fact. The reference in paragraph 21 is taken from the judgment of the High Court in Kelly v National University of Ireland & Anor [2012] IEHC 169 (9 May 2012). At paragraph 12 of that judgment Hedigan J. had stated that the “ Article 234 reference was determined by the ECJ. When the matter ......