Leyden v Attorney General
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Supreme Court (Irish Free State) |
| Judgment Date | 21 December 1926 |
| Docket Number | (1924. No. 4.) |
| Date | 21 December 1926 |
Contract of service with Commissioners of National Education - Construction - Ambiguity as to amount of salary -Whether amount fixed by reference to antecedent regulations of the Commissioners - Power to vary - "Permanent salary" - War bonus -Application for fixed increase - Matter referred to Civil Service Arbitration Board - Binding effect of Board's award - Validity of subsequent reduction of salary - Transfer of jurisdiction from Commissioners of National Education to National Education Commissioners - Validity of Statutory Order - Appointments made thereunder - Action claiming a declaration of rights against a Government Department - Enforceability of contract where payment is dependent upon a grant from Parliament - Constitution of the Irish Free State (Saorstát Eireann) Act, 1922 (No. 1 of 1922), Sch. I., Arts. 73 and 80 - Adaptation of Enactments Act, 1922 (No. 2 of 1922), s. 7 (1) (3) and(4); s. 15 (1) - Provisional Government (Transfer of Functions) Order, 1922 (Stat. R. Or., 1922, No. 315) - National Education Commissioners Order, 1923 (Stat. R. Or., No. 10 of 1923.
By an agreement made in 1912 between the Commissioners of National Education and the local manager of the Central Boys' Model School of the one part and the plaintiff of the other part, the local manager agreed to employ the plaintiff as the assistant teacher of the school on the terms and conditions therein stated. Clause 7 of the agreement...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Crowley v Ireland
...In support of this contention the plaintiffs referred to the Judgment of Mr. Justice Murnaghan inLevden .v. Attorney General and ors. ( 1926 I.R.334 at p 354) in which the history of the State control over primary education in Ireland since 1831 is described. The rules and regulations issue......
-
Bohane v Driscoll
...[1907] S. C. 1102. (13) [1908] S. C. 1034, at p. 1039. (14) [1899] 2 I.R. 1. (15) [1917] 2 I.R. 73, 621. (16) [1900] 1 Q. B. 535. (17) [1926] I.R. 334. (18) 68 J. P. 158. (1) 4 C. B. (N.S.) (2) L. R. 2 C. P. 371, at p. 375. (3) [1913] 1 K. B. 398, at p. 415. (4) 12 P. D. 58, at p. 92. (1) [......
-
Crowley v Ireland
...213. 4 Meskell v. Córas Iompair Éireann éireann [1973] I.R. 121. 5 Murphy v. Stewart [1973] I.R. 97. 6 Leyden v. The Attorney General [1926] I.R. 334. 7 McEneaney v. The Minister for Education [1941] I.R. 430. 8 O'Callaghan v. The Minister for Education (Supreme Court-31/3/55) 9 Doyle, In r......
- Re McEneaney v Minister for Education