Lynch v Fitzgerald and Others
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Supreme Court (Irish Free State) |
| Judgment Date | 30 July 1938 |
| Date | 30 July 1938 |
- Suppression by force - Armed forces of State - Use of firearms - Firing at civilians -Principles governing us of firearms - Whether firing necessary as a last resort.
The plaintiff claimed damages under the Fatal Accidents Act, 1846, for the death of his son, who was killed at Marsh's Yard, Copley Street, Cork, by a bullet fired by one of a group of detectives of the Special Branch of the Civic Guards which included three of the defendants, Moore, Condon and Rogers. The fourth defendant was a Chief Superintendent of the Civic Guards who was in charge of the Civic Guards at Cork. In view of a threatened demonstration against a sale by the sheriff of cattle seized under a warrant from the Irish Land Commission a force of about 200 Guards with about 12 armed detectives was placed outside the yard, and 40 Guards, including 10 ordinary detectives, were placed inside...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
DPP v Peter Cullen
...ROAD TRAFFIC ACT 1994 S10 ROAD TRAFFIC ACT 2006 S18 TRAFFIC ACT 1961 S6(A) WALSH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 2002 PARA 4.55 LYNCH v FITZGERALD 1938 1 IR 382 LEIGH v COLE (1853) 6 COX CC 329 DPP v DALY UNREP HAMILTON 3.3.1986 DPP v GAFFNEY 1987 IR 173 1986 ILRM 657 1986/5/423 DPP v DELANEY & ORS 1997......
-
Finn v Attorney General
...the plaintiff “a mere” escaping felon? The age old test must be applied, to wit, “reasonable force”. 37 Hanna J. in Lynch v. Fitzgerald [1938] I.R. 382 having reviewed the previous authorities on the subject the power to use firearms, had this to say: “Arms now at such a, stage of perfectio......