Lynham v Butler (No. 2)

JurisdictionIreland
CourtHigh Court (Irish Free State)
Judgment Date01 January 1933
Date01 January 1933
[H. C., S. C., I.F.S.]
Lynham
and
Butler (No. 2)

Jurisdiction of Commissioners of the Land Commission other than Judicial Commissioner - Exercise of powers conferred by Land Act, 1923 - Ascertainment of lands to be vested in the Land Commission -Whether exercising judicial or administrative powers - Whether jurisdiction conferred a violation of the Constitution - Status of Judicial Commissioner on hearing appeals - "Judicial power of the Irish Free State" - Pleading - Practice -Rejoinder - Motion to strike out paragraphs of rejoinder - Estoppel - Land Law (Commission) Act, 1923 (No. 27 of 1923), ss. 4, 12 - Land Act, 1923 (No. 42 of 1923), ss.24, 40 - Constitution of the Irish Free State (Saorstát Eireann) Act, 1922 (No. 1 of 1922), Sch. I, Arts. 2, 64, 68, 69.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant, claiming mesne rates, or, alternatively, damages for trespass, in respect of the defendant's occupation of certain lands from August 22nd, 1924, to April 3rd, 1928. The former date was the date of the death of the cestui-que-vie for whose life the lands had been demised by the plaintiff to the defendant. The latter date was the date upon which the defendant had delivered up possession. The defendant, in his defence, pleaded that under and by virtue of the Land Acts, 1923, 1926 and 1927, he was entitled to the full beneficial occupation and possession of the lands as occupier of tenanted lands within the meaning of the said Acts to the exclusion of the plaintiff. He further pleaded a judgment of the High Court, affirmed by the Supreme Court, in a prior action of ejectment between the parties, as a decision in rem and as estoppel. By the said judgment the plaintiff's claim for possession of the lands had been dismissed on the ground that the Land Act, 1923, applied to them (reported [1925] 2 I. R. 82, 231). He also relied upon an order of the Judicial Commissioner, dated February 7th, 1924, declaring that the Land Act, 1923, applied to the lands; and he counterclaimed for possession. In his reply, the plaintiff pleaded a later order of the Judicial Commissioner, dated June 29th, 1926, made on appeal from a decision of the Commissioners of the Irish Land Commission other than the Judicial Commissioner in reference to the plaintiff's objection to the inclusion of the lands in a provisional list of lands to be vested under the Land Act, 1923. By the said order, the Judicial Commissioner had discharged his previous order of February 7th...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • O'Donoghue v Ireland
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 24 November 1999
    ...LyonsUNK (1983) 461 U.S. 95. Lujan v. Defenders of Wild LifeUNK (1992) 504 U.S. 555. Lynham v. Butler (No. 2)IRDLTR [1933] I.R. 74; (1933) 67 I.L.T.R. 75; [1932] L.J. Ir. 172. McDonald v. Bord na gCon (No. 2)IRDLTR [1965] I.R. 217; (1965) 100 I.L.T.R. 89. Murphy v. G.M. (Unreported, High Co......
  • Deighan v Hearne
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 27 August 1986
    ...TAX ACT 1967 S485 INCOME TAX ACT 1967 S500 INSPECTOR OF TAXES V KIERNAN 1981 IR 117 1982 ILRM 13 LYNHAM V BUTLER (NO 2) 1933 IR 74, 67 ILTR 75 MACAULEY V MIN POSTS & TELEGRAPHS 1966 IR 345 MCGLINCHEY V WREN 1982 IR 154 1983 ILRM 169 MURPHY V DUBLIN CORPORATION 1972 IR 215, 107 ILTR 6......
  • Keady v Commissioner of an Garda Síochána
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1992
    ...[1990] 2 I.R. 396. Kiely v. Minister for Social Welfare (No. 2)IR [1977] I.R. 267. Lynham v. Butler (No. 2)IRDLTR [1933] I.R. 74; (1931) 67 I.L.T.R. 75; [1932] L.J. Ir. 172. M. v. The Medical CouncilIR [1984] I.R. 485. In re M. a DoctorIR [1984] I.R. 479. McDonald v. Bord na gCon (No. 2)IRD......
  • Goodman International v Hamilton
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1992
    ...GeneralIR [1981] I.R. 233. Ex parte Leahy; ex parte Rayment (1904) 4 S.R. (N.S.W.) 401. Lynham v. ButlerIRDLTR [1933] I.R. 74; (1931) 67 I.L.T.R. 75; [1932] L.J. Ir. 172. Maher v. The Attorney GeneralIRDLTR [1973] I.R. 140; (1973) 108 I.L.T.R. 41. McDonald v. Bord na gConIRDLTR [1965] I.R. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • George Gavan Duffy
    • Ireland
    • Irish Judicial Studies Journal Nbr. 2-2, July 2002
    • 1 July 2002
    ...were ringing eleven o’clock, would adjourn for a light lunch at 1 p.m., and resume the court hearing from 2 16[1940] I.R. 136. 17(1933) 67 I.L.T.R. 75. 2002] George Gavan Duffy p.m. to 4 p.m. He would usually get home at about 5 p.m. and would relax for an hour with the family. He would the......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT