Lyons v Governor of the Midlands Prison

 
FREE EXCERPT

[2017] IEHC 235

THE HIGH COURT

Eagar J.

[2017 No. 5 S.S.P.]

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION UNDER ARTICLE 40.4.2 OF THE CONSTITUTION

BETWEEN
KENNETH LYONS
APPLICANT
AND
THE GOVERNOR OF THE MIDLANDS PRISON
RESPONDENT

Constitution – Art. 40.4.2 of the Constitution – Convictions for attempted robbery and attempt to rob – Unlawful detention – Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001.

JUDGMENT of Mr. Justice Eagar delivered on the 7th day of April, 2017
1

The applicant is a prisoner at the Midlands Prison, Portlaoise, Co. Laois. He is held on foot of two warrants, the first indicating a date of conviction on the 29th of November, 2016 with the Count No. 1 of attempting to rob D.L. contrary to common law. The sentence imposed by the court was one of three years' imprisonment to date from the 10th of March, 2017.

2

The second warrant related to a date of sentence of the 10th of March, 2017 where the offence was of attempted robbery of D.L. contrary to common law and the sentence of the court was that the accused be in prison for a period of five years and six months. This sentence was to date from the lawful expiration of the sentence of three years imposed on the previous warrant with the final four years of the combined sentences of eight years and six months suspended in terms as entered by the accused on this date in court.

3

The accused seeks an inquiry under Article 40 in the following circumstances: he states on affidavit that the warrants of imprisonment under which he is held refer to attempted robbery contrary to common law. He said that the common law offence of robbery was abolished by virtue of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001.

4

Section 3 of the Act provides as follows:

'3(2). Any offence at common law of larceny, burglary, robbery, cheating (except in relation to the public revenue), extortion under colour of office and forgery is abolished.'

Robbery is now appropriately charged under s. 14(1) of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001.

5

However, the applicant is not detained on foot of warrants alleging robbery, rather warrants alleging attempted robbery. Attempted robbery is an incomplete or more formally an inchoate offence, one of three inchoate offences contrary to common law: attempt, conspiracy...

To continue reading

REQUEST YOUR TRIAL