McBain v McDonald

JurisdictionIreland
JudgeMr. Justice Frederick Morris
Judgment Date21 January 1991
Neutral Citation1991 WJSC-HC 912
Docket NumberNo. 3104P/1985,[1985 No. 3104P]
CourtHigh Court
Date21 January 1991

1991 WJSC-HC 912

THE HIGH COURT

No. 3104P/1985
MCDONALD v. MCBAIN

BETWEEN

AINE McDONALD
PLAINTIFF
v.
ANDREW GILLIES McBAIN
DEFENDANT

Citations:

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS 1957 S11

KING V VICTOR PARSONS & CO 1973 1 WLR 29

BEAMAN V ARTS LTD 1949 1 KB 550

HEGARTY V O'LOUGHRAN 1990 ILRM 403

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS 1957 S11(2)(A)

Synopsis:

LIMITATION OF ACTIONS

Time limit

Extension - Ground - Fraud - Cause of action - Knowledge - Acquisition - Point of time - Trespass - Concealment by wrongdoer - Failure of trespasser to disclose wrongdoing - Statute of Limitations, 1957, ss. 11, 71 - (1985/3104 P - Morris J. - 21/1/91) - [1991] 1 I.R. 284 - [1991] ILRM 764

|McDonald v. McBain|

WORDS AND PHRASES

"Concealed by the fraud"

Action - Institution - Time limit - Expiration - Extension - Cause of action - Concealment by wrongdoer - Failure of trespasser to disclose wrongdoing - (1985/3104 P - Morris J. - 21/1/91) - [1991] 1 I.R. 284 - [1991] ILRM 764

|McDonald v. McBain|

1

Judgment of Mr. Justice Frederick Morrisdelivered the 21st day of January 1991

2

At the conclusion of the Plaintiff's evidence Counsel for the Defendant applied to me for a non-suit on the grounds that the Plaintiff is precluded from proceeding with this Action as the Proceedings were not instituted within the time limit specified by Section 11 of the Statute of Limitations 1957. The limitation period in the circumstances of this case is six years and the following are the relevant dates.

3

The premises, the subject matter of these proceedings, were burnt on the 29th March 1974. The limitation period would, accordingly, have expired on the 29th March 1980. The Action was commenced by way of Plenary Summons issued on the 10th April 1985. The Plaintiff claims damages for the destruction of the house and contents, basing her claim on the allegations of breach of contract, trespass and negligence on the part of the Defendant.

4

It would appear in the first instance that the claim is Statute barred. However, Counsel on behalf of thePlaintiff contends that the claim based on trespass is not barred by virtue of Section 71 of the Statute of Limitations 1957 because, he says, the Plaintiff's right of action was concealed by the fraud on the part of the Defendant and, accordingly, the limitation period should not run until the Plaintiff discovered the fraud or could, with reasonable diligence, have done so.

5

A further argument is then addressed to me on the basis that the claim based on trespass could only arise when the Plaintiff had knowledge of the fact that the Defendant was the person who actually set fire to the premises and since she only learnt this when the Defendant admitted the fact to her on the 22nd October 1983 that it was only at that stage that the limitation period commenced to run.

6

Counsel for the Plaintiff has argued that the Defendant's failure to disclose that he was the perpetrator of the wrong can, in the circumstances, amount to fraud within the meaning of the Statute of Limitations 1957. In support of this argument he cites King v. Victor Parsons & Co. 1973 1 WLR 29, 33/4 and he relies on that part of Lord Denning's Judgment where he says:

"In order to show that he concealed the right of action "by fraud" it is not necessary to show that he took active steps to conceal his wrongdoing or breach of contract. It is sufficient that he knowingly committed it and did not tell the owner anything about it. He did the wrong or committed the breach secretly. By saying nothing he kept it secret. He conceals the right of action. He conceals it by "fraud" as those words have been interpreted in thecases. To this word "knowingly" there must be added"recklessly"."

7

Counsel argues that in the present case the Defendant's failure to come forward and acknowledge that he set fire to the premises constituted fraud within that definition.

8

He also relies on Beaman v. A.R.T.S. Limited 1949 I K.B. 550and seeks support from the Judgment of the Chief Justice in Hegartyv. O'Loughran 1990 ILRM 403 where he says:-

"I would therefore conclude that the proper construction of this sub-section is that contended for by the defendant and that is that the time limit commenced to run at the time when a provable personal injury, capable of attracting compensation, occurred...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Gough v Neary & Cronin
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 3 July 2003
    ...STATUTES ANNOTATED 1991–1992 LAW REFORM (PERSONAL INJURIES) ACT 1948 (UK) S14(1) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ACT 1957 S71 MCDONALD V MCBAIN 1991 1 IR 284 KING V VICTOR PARSONS & CO 1973 1 WLR 29 KITCHEN V ROYAL AIRFORCE ASSOC 1958 1 WLR 563 BEAMAN V ARTS LTD 1949 1 KB 550 LAWRANCE V NORREYS 1......
  • Minister for Finance v Civil and Public Service Union
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 11 May 2006
    ...2003 2 ILRM 210 RSC O.84A r4 FUREY, STATE v MIN DEFENCE & AG 1988 ILRM 89 GLEESON, STATE v MIN FOR DEFENCE 1976 IR 280 MCDONALD v MCBAIN 1991 1 IR 284 1991 ILRM 764 MARKS & SPENCER PLC v WILLIAMS-RYAN 2005 EWCA CIV 470 2005 ICR 1293 2005 IRLR 562 DEDMAN v BRITISH BUILDING & ENGINEERING APPL......
  • Thomson v an Bord Pleanála
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 24 July 2023
    ...[2018] 12 JIC 2102 (Unreported, High Court, Simons J., 21st December, 2018) at para. 121. The principle outlined in McBain v McDonald [1991] 1 I.R. 284, [1991] I.L.R.M. 764, 1991 WJSC-HC 912, [1991] 1 JIC 2102 applies by analogy. There, Morris P. noted that a plaintiff, within the limitatio......
  • Dunne v Kildare County Council
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 17 February 2023
    ...where she could always benefit from more evidence to bolster her case. This crucial distinction is illustrated by McBain v McDonald [1991] 1 I.R. 284, [1991] I.L.R.M. 764, where Morris P. noted that a plaintiff, within the limitation period, had access to evidence which “was already availab......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT