McClure v McClure
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | High Court |
| Judgment Date | 20 March 1951 |
| Date | 20 March 1951 |
Practice - Attachment - Limit of time to comply with Court Order - Order not served within the time limited for compliance - Non-compliance with Order - Enforcement by committal - Application for committal refused.
Appeal from the Circuit Court.
By his civil bill, dated the 11th September, 1947, the plaintiff claimed an injunction directing the defendant to leave certain lands, the property of the plaintiff, and to remove therefrom stock belonging to the defendant which it was alleged were wrongfully being depastured by the defendant thereon. An appearance was entered and a defence was delivered, and upon the hearing of the action on the 22nd April, 1948, judgment was given in favour of the plaintiff. The material portion of the order of the Circuit Court Judge was as follows: "And the Court doth further order that the defendant do leave the lands and remove his stock and effects therefrom within two months from the date of this order, and the said defendant his servants and agents are hereby strictly enjoined and restrained from repetition or continuance of the acts of trespass. . . ." The defendant was present in Court during the proceedings and at the time of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Laois County Council v Scully
...WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT 1996 S57 RSC O.41 r8 WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT 1996 S55 CENTURY INSURANCE CO LTD v LARKIN 1910 IR 91 MCCLURE v MCCLURE 1951 1 IR 137 RSC O.70 r68 RSC O.121 r8 O FLOINN PRACTICE & PROCEDURE IN THE SUPERIOR COURTS 1ED 1996 968 RSC O.9 r2 RSC O.84 r1 RSC O.84 r1(3) 2005/15MCA -......
-
Star Elms Frames Ltd & Companies Acts
...for the defendant, and that the defendant appeared personally in court. On the other hand, the point at issue in McClure v. McClure [1951] I.R. 137 was not so much the question of personal service as the fact that the order when originally served did not contain a penal endorsement and that......
-
Pepper Finance Corporation (Ireland) DAC v Persons Unknown in Occupation of the Property known as 21 Little Mary Street, Dublin 7
...have not required service to be personal service. The cases [ Century Insurance Company v. Larkin [1910] 1 IR 91 and McClure v. McClure [1951] IR 137] to which I have referred can be distinguished on their facts. That is not to say that out of an abundance of caution a plaintiff's solicitor......