McEleney v McCarron

JurisdictionIreland
JudgeFINLAY C.J.
Judgment Date01 January 1993
Neutral Citation1992 WJSC-SC 3826
Docket Number[1988 No. 6608P]
CourtSupreme Court
Date01 January 1993

1992 WJSC-SC 3826

THE SUPREME COURT

Finlay C.J.

Hederman J.

O'Flaherty J.

61/92
75/92
MCELENEY v. MCCARRON
GERARD McELENEY
Plaintiff/
Respondent

and

JOHN McCARRON AND NEIL McCARRON
Defendants/
Appellants

Synopsis:

NEGLIGENCE

Motorist

Duty - care - Standard - Accident - Circumstance - Facts found by trial judge - Inferences drawn by trial judge - Defendant found negligent - Girls at side of road at night trying to stop defendant - Drunk plaintiff lying with head on roadside beside girls - Defendant drove car over plaintiff's head - Different inferences drawn by appellate court from same facts - (61, 73/92 - Supreme Court - 21/12/92)- [1993] 2 I.R. 132

|McEleney v. McCarron|

SUPREME COURT

Appeal

Facts - Assessment - Trial judge - Finding - Basis - Inferences drawn by trial judge - Opposite inference drawn by the appellate court - (61, 75/92 - Supreme Court - 21/12/92)- [1993] 2 I.R. 132

|McEleney v. McCarron|

1

JUDGMENT delivered on the 21st day of December 1992 by FINLAY C.J. [NEM DISS]

2

This is an appeal by the Defendants against an order of the High Court made on the 24th January 1992 in an action for damages for personal injuries brought by the Plaintiff against the Defendants arising out of a road traffic accident. The High Court order:

3

1. Found the Defendants negligent.

4

2. Found the Plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence.

5

3. Apportioned fault as to the Defendants 70 per cent and as to the Plaintiff 30 per cent.

6

4. Assessed gross damages at £1,164,583 and gave judgment to the Plaintiff for a sum of £815,208.10.

7

The Defendants appealed against the following:

8

(a) The finding of negligence against them.

9

(b) The proportions of fault contained in the judgment.

10

(c) Certain items of the damages awarded.

11

The Plaintiff served a notice to vary concerning one element of the damages awarded.

12

The Court decided to hear and determine first the issues of liability the subject matter of the Defendants" appeal.

13

The facts out of which this accident occurred were not in dispute, and the learned trial judge did not in the course of his judgment reject the credibility of the testimony of any of the witnesses.

14

In the course of his judgment on the issue of liability which he delivered separate to any judgment on the issue of damages, the learned trial judge described the happening of the accident in the following paragraphs. To that description and its accuracy no challenge was made by either party on the hearing of this appeal.

"On the 27th March 1988 the plaintiff who lives at 7, Gaddyduff Cottages, Clonmany, Co. Donegal, attended a disco at the Strand Hotel, Ballyliffen where he was very drunk. There's agreement on the plaintiff's condition as regards drink and he appears to have progressed to the comatose. At approximately 3 a.m. the plaintiff returned to his home village by bus. He slept on the bus and the bus stopped in Clonmany outside the Chapel on the Buncrana side. The plaintiff was helped off the bus by Terence McCarron who appears to have left him propped against the Church wall and to have gone off. Gaynor Gill and Elaine Doherty each knew the plaintiff, had been at the same disco and had travelled home on the same bus. The plaintiff was slumped against the Church wall and the girls realised that he needed help to get home. They tried to talk to him initially but got no response. They then tried to propel him home each supporting one arm. The plaintiff, who is very tall, kept falling backwards and finally fell out on to the road. He lay with his feet on the path and his torso on the road. The girls tried to lift the plaintiff from the road but were unable to do so. They then thought to drag him in off the road, one going on each side of him and pulling at a leg each. In that fashion they pulled him on to the path to at least the level of the waist but his head and probably most of his torso remained on the road. The second-named defendant ironically had been at the same disco and while there had...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Reilly v Mangan
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 21 February 2019
    ...care for the safety of members of the public when he is operating his taxi. 37 The Supreme Court decision in McEleney v. McCarron [1993] 2 I.R. 132 concerned a case where two women were helping a drunken man get home, but he ended up with his torso and head on the road when a passing car h......
  • Boyne v Bus Atha Cliath
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 11 April 2002
    ...581 INSURANCE COMMISSIONER V JOYCE 1948 77 CLR 47 MCKEVITT V IRELAND 1987 ILRM 546 DONOGHUE V STEVENSON 1932 AC 562 MCELENEY V MCCARRON 1993 2 IR 132 JUDGE V REAPE 1968 IR 226 WELLS V WELLS 1998 3 AER 481 REDDY V BATES 1983 IR 141 1 Judgment of Mr. Justice Finnegan delivered the 11th da......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT