Minister for Justice and Equality v Marjasz
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Court | High Court |
Judge | Mr. Justice Edwards |
Judgment Date | 24 April 2012 |
Neutral Citation | [2012] IEHC 233 |
Date | 24 April 2012 |
BETWEEN
- AND -
[2012] IEHC 233
THE HIGH COURT
EXTRADITION
European arrest warrant
Application for surrender for serving of sentence - European arrest warrant - Objections - Poland - Breach of constitutional rights - Right to legal representation - Lack of correspondence with Irish law - Prosecution predated setting up of European arrest warrant system - Sentence initially suspended for three years - Suspension lifted - Tried in absentia for offence that triggered lifting of suspension - No legal representation - Request to issuing state for further information - Legal aid in issuing state - Extant conviction result of unfair trial - Review of trial process - Presumption of fair trial - Duty of utmost good faith - Mutual trust and confidence - Right to be informed of right to legal aid - Forced to confess by police - Right not to be deprived of liberty - Handling of stolen property - Criminal damage without lawful excuse - Minimum gravity - Proportionality - Whether cogent evidence of unfair trial - Whether surrender incompatible with Convention or Constitution - Whether surrender prohibited - Whether correspondence with offence in Irish law - Whether fled from issuing state - Minister for Justice v Brennan [2007] IESC 21, [2007] 3 IR 732; Minister for Justice v Stapleton [2007] IESC 30, [2008] 1 IR 669; State (Healy) v Donoghue [1976] IR 325; Cahill v Reilly [1994] 3 IR 547; McSorley v Governor of Mountjoy Prison [1996] 2 ILRM 331; Clarke v Kirby [1998] 2 ILRM 30; Leonard v Garavan [2003] 4 IR 60; Nottinghamshire County Council v B [2011] IESC 48 (Unrep, SC, 15/12/2011); Attorney General v Dyer [2004] 1 IR 40; Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform v Dolny [2009] IESC 48, (Unrep, SC, 18/6/2009); Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform v Sas [2010] IESC 16, (Unrep, SC, 18/3/2010); Minister for Justice v Tobin [2007] IEHC 15 & [2008] IESC 3, [2008] 4 IR 42 and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform v Slonski [2010] IESC 19, (Unrep, SC, 25/3/2010) considered - European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 (Designated Member States) (No 3) Order 2004 (SI 206/2004), art 2 - European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 (No 45), ss 3(1), 4A, 10, 13, 16, 20(1), 21A, 22, 23, 24, 37, 38 and 45 - Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) Act 2005 (No 2), ss 71, 79, 80, 81 and 82 - Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001 (No 50), s 17(1) - Criminal Law Act 1997 (No 14), s 7(1) - Criminal Damage Act 1991 (No 31), s 2(1) - Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2009 (No 28) - Constitution of Ireland 1937, Arts 38 and 40.4.2 - Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950, art 6 - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, art 47 - Surrender refused (2010/386EXT & 2012/387EXT - Edwards J - 24/4/2012) [2012] IEHC 233
Minister for Justice and Equality v Marjasz
Facts: The respondent, a Polish national, was the subject of two European Arrest Warrants ("the warrants") dating back to 2006. The respondent had been arrested on the foot of the warrants in 2011. The first warrant sought the arrest of the respondent with a view to having him return to serve a sentence of five months imprisonment. The respondent sought to object to his surrender.
Held by Edwards J, that surrender of the respondent on the second of the warrants would be refused as the respondent appeared to have been tried in absentia and without notification of the proceedings.
In regards of the first of the warrants, the respondent submitted, inter alia, that his surrender was prohibited by ss 37 and 38 of the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 for infringing his constitutional rights and lack of correspondence respectively.
The Court considered that a refusal to order surrender on s 37 grounds that a conviction was obtained after an unfair trial would be made in limited circumstances only. The Court would start with a presumption that the trial was fair and it was necessary for the subject of the warrant to first seek remedy in the issuing state before challenging the matter in the current jurisdiction. The evidence suggested the respondent was not denied his rights at trial nor misinformed about his rights. Further, there was no evidence that he was mistreated by the police. His submissions on s 37 were therefore without merit.
The respondent contended that the offences the first warrant related to had no correspondence with offences in Irish law. Whilst this was not true in respect of one offence, the other offence did not correspond to an offence in Irish law. Irish law required a number of elements that were not specified, and could not be inferred, in the first of the warrants. The Court would therefore refuse the surrender of the respondent accordingly. Attorney General v Dyer [2004] 1 IR 40 applied
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S16
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S45
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S13
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S3(1)
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 (DESIGNATED MEMBER STATES) (NO 3) ORDER 2004 SI 206/2004 ART 2
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 (DESIGNATED MEMBER STATES) (NO 3) ORDER 2004 SI 206/2004 SCHED
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S21A
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S22
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S23
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S24
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (TERRORIST OFFENCES) ACT 2005 S79
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (TERRORIST OFFENCES) ACT 2005 S80
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (TERRORIST OFFENCES) ACT 2005 S81
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (TERRORIST OFFENCES) ACT 2005 S82
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 PART III
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S37
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S38
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S10
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S20(1)
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND ART 16
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND ART 78
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND ART 79
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND ART 80
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND ART 81
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND ART 300
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S37(1)(A)
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S37(1)(B)
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S37(2)
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S37(1)
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS & FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 6
CONSTITUTION ART 38
CONSTITUTION ART 38.1
CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ART 47
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 13.6.2002 (EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003) RECITAL 12
MIN FOR JUSTICE v BRENNAN 2007 3 IR 732 2007/40/8282 2007 IESC 21
CONSTITUTION ART 40.4.2
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S4A
MIN FOR JUSTICE v STAPLETON 2008 1 IR 669 2008 1 ILRM 267 2007/41/8499 2007 IESC 30
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS & FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 6(3)(C)
HEALY, STATE v DONOGHUE & ORS 1976 IR 325
CAHILL v JUDGE REILLY & DPP 1994 3 IR 547 1992/5/1572
MCSORLEY & MULHOLLAND v GOVERNOR OF MOUNTJOY PRISON 1996 2 ILRM 331 1996/6/1753
CLARKE v JUDGE KIRBY & DPP 1998 2 ILRM 30
LEONARD v JUDGE GARAVAN 2003 4 IR 60 2002/15/3632
NOTTINGHAMSHIRE CO COUNCIL v B (K) & B (K) UNREP SUPREME 15.12.2011 2011 IESC 48
PENAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND ART 291(1)
PENAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND ART 288(1)
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (THEFT & FRAUD OFFENCES) ACT 2001 S17(1)
CRIMINAL LAW ACT 1997 S7(1)
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (THEFT & FRAUD OFFENCES) ACT 2001 S17(1)(A)
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (THEFT & FRAUD OFFENCES) ACT 2001 S17(1)(B)
CRIMINAL DAMAGE ACT 1991 S2(1)
AG v DYER 2004 1 IR 40 2004 1 ILRM 542 2004/3/491 2004 IESC 1
MIN FOR JUSTICE v DOLNY UNREP SUPREME 18.6.2009 2009/39/9618 2009 IESC 48
MIN FOR JUSTICE v SAS UNREP SUPREME 18.3.2010 2010/34/8657 2010 IESC 16
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 2009 S6
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (TERRORIST OFFENCES) ACT 2005 S71
MIN FOR JUSTICE v TOBIN 2008 4 IR 42
PENAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND ART 75(1)
MIN FOR JUSTICE v SLONSKI 2010 2 ILRM 387 2010/36/9019 2010 IESC 19
JUDGMENT of Mr. Justice Edwards delivered on the 24 th day of April, 2012
This case concerns applications by the applicant for orders pursuant to s. 16 of the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 (hereinafter the Act of 2003) surrendering the respondent to Poland on foot of two European arrest warrants dated the 17 th July, 2006, (covering case ref: II K 268/01) and the 7 th August, 2006, (covering case ref: II K 217/03) respectively. However, the controversies addressed in this judgment relate only to the first of those warrants in circumstances where the applicant acknowledges that the respondent was tried in absentia for the single offence which is the subject of the second warrant. No undertaking pursuant to s.45 of the Act of 2003 is forthcoming from Poland, and there is no evidence that the respondent was duly notified of his trial by means of a document personally served upon him. In the circumstances the Court has had no option but to refuse to surrender the respondent on foot of the warrant dated the 7 th August, 2006.
In so far as the first warrant (i.e. the warrant dated the 17 th July, 2006) is concerned, that warrant was endorsed by the High Court for execution in this jurisdiction on the 20 th October, 2010. The respondent was arrested in execution of that warrant by Detective Garda Ray Shortall on the 10 th January, 2011, at Kells, Co. Meath following which he was brought promptly before the High Court in accordance with s.13 of the Act of 2003....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Minister for Justice and Equality v Iacobuta
...unfair in the issuing state. Edwards J. stated as follows at para. 87: - ‘In Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform v. Marjasz [2012] IEHC 233, (unreported, High Court, Edwards J., 24th of April, 2012) this Court acknowledged that, notwithstanding the principle of mutual recognition,......
-
Minister for Justice and Equality v Bailey
...for surrender should be refused pursuant to s. 37(2) of the Act.” 130 In Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform v. Marjasz [2012] IEHC 233 and Minister for Justice and Equality v. Magdalena Rostas [2014] IEHC 391, Edwards J. stressed that in cases where surrender is sought to enforce......
-
Minister for Justice and Equality v Magdalena Rostas
...INLR 621 CHARTER OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ART 20 MIN FOR JUSTICE v MARJASZ UNREP EDWARDS 24.4.2012 2012/27/7834 2012 IEHC 233 LACATUS & ORS v ROMANIA APPLICATION NO. 12694/04 13.2.2013 GERGELY v HUNGARY APPLICATION NO. 23364/03 31.10.2006 KALANYOS v ROMANIA APPLICATIO......
-
Minister for Justice & Equality v Arkadiusz Krzysztof Guz
...EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S10 EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 S10(D) MIN FOR JUSTICE v MARJASZ UNREP EDWARDS 24.4.2012 2012 IEHC 233 PANOVITS v CYPRUS 2008 27 BHRC 464 CRIMINAL JUSTICE (THEFT & FRAUD OFFENCES) ACT 2001 S26 CRIMINAL JUSTICE (THEFT & FRAUD OFFENCES) ACT 2001 S6 EUROPE......