Parkes v Parkes
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judgment Date | 01 January 1980 |
Date | 01 January 1980 |
Court | High Court |
Deception - Husband purchasing property in name of wife - Presumption of the advancement rebutted - Resulting trust - Huband procuring wife to make false declaration in conveyance - Husband subsequently invoking court's aid to enforce trust -Whether husband entitled to relief in equity -Finance (No. 2), Act, 1947 (No. 11) - s. 13 (1), (4) and (5) - Finance Act, 1951 (No. 15), s. 17 - Land Act, 1965 (No. 2), ss. 45 (2) (a), 45 (3) - Finance Act, 1965 (No. 22), s. 66 (6).
The plaintiff, who prior to her divorce in 1969 had been the defendant's wife, was the registered owner of land purchased by her husband in October, 1965. The deed of conveyance contained a false certificate asserting that the plaintiff, an Irish citizen, was entitled to the entire beneficial ownership. The defendant, in directing that the land be conveyed into his wife's name, was motivated by the desire to avoid the obstacles associated with the purchase of land by non-nationals. As a British subject he would have been required to pay stamp duty at the higher rate of 25% imposed by s. 13 (4) of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1947, and to submit to the doubt and delay of obtaining the consent of the Land Commission to the sale...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R (G) v D (J J)
...& DISCLOSURE 2ED 2013 CHAP 4 RSC O31 r.12 MCKENNA v BEST TRAVEL LTD 1995 1 IR 577 1995 2 ILRM 471 1995/10/2847 PARKES v PARKES 1980 ILRM 137 1980/18/3094 GASCOIGNE v GASCOIGNE 1918 1 KB 223 118 LT 347 34 TLR 168 RYANAIR v AER RIANTA 2003 4 IR 264 2004 1 ILRM 241 2003/46/11374 SWORDS v W......
-
Walsh v Walsh
...discussed in Gascoigne v. Gascoigne [1918] 1 K.B. 223 and McEvoy v. Belfast Banking Co. Ltd [1935] A.C. 24, Parkes v. Parkes [1980] I.L.R.M. 137. 69 In Revenue Commissioners v. Droog [2016] IESC 55, at para. 1.1, Clarke J. refers to a distinction between tax evasion, which involves ' th......
-
Stanley (plaintiff) v Kieran
...or to benefit defendant - Battle v Irish Art Promotion Centre Ltd [1968] IR 252; Dyer v Dyer (1788) 2 Cox Eq Cas 92; Parkes v Parkes [1980] ILRM 137; Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340; Lowson v Coombes [1999] Ch 373 considered - Standing v Bowring (1885) 31 Ch D 282 followed - Claim dism......
-
Bergin v Walsh
...to refuse such relief in the light of this wrongful conduct: see, e.g., generally the judgment of Costello J. in Parkes v. Parkes [1980] I.L.R.M. 137, 142-145. 338 338. There is, however, no equivalent to s. 26 of the 2004 Act so far as the present claim is concerned. Since the plaintiff's ......
-
Illegality, Resulting Trusts and Twin Presumptions: Antiquated Law Meets Modern Society
...evidence to support a real finding of intention’. 89 80 Delany (n 38) citing Collier v Collier [2002] EWCA Civ 1095 [97] (Mance LJ). 81 [1980] ILRM 137. 82 Delany (n 38) citing Parkes v Parkes [1980] ILRM 137 [144] (Costello J). 83 Delany (n 38). 84 ibid. 85 Thornton (n 58) 394. 86 Robert P......