People (Attorney General) v Carney and Another
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1953 |
| Date | 01 January 1953 |
Two persons tried jointly -Application for separate trial refused - Larceny -Alternative count of receiving - Necessity for evidence that receiver of stolen goods did not steal them - Whether case one of larceny or nothing -Credibility of witness a matter for the jury -Comment thereon by Judge - Evidence of accomplice -No corroboration - Necessity for warning to jury of danger of convicting on such evidence -Whether a witness be an accomplice or not a matter for the jury - Larceny Act, 1916 (6 7 Geo. 5, c.50) s. 25 (1), s. 33 (1).
M. and C. were tried jointly on charges of housebreaking and larceny, and feloniously receiving. They were acquittedon the count of housebreaking and larceny but found guilty on...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
DPP v Morgan
...of Police [2009] 1 All ER 229; R v North Haven Magistrates Court [2009] EWHC 3614; Davies v DPP [1954] AC 378; People (AG) v Carney [1955] IR 324; AG v Linehan [1929] IR 19 - Leave to appeal - Point of law of exceptional public importance - Whether Court could certify question of law which ......
- People (Attorney General) v Carney and Another