People (Attorney General) v Grimes
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judgment Date | 01 July 1955 |
Date | 01 July 1955 |
Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
Court of Criminal Appeal.
Criminal law - Sentence of imprisonment imposed by Circuit Judge - Sentence suspended by Court of Criminal Appeal on accused entering into recognisance to keep the peace and be of good behaviour - Breach of recognisance - Application to Circuit Judge to enforce the suspended sentence refused - Similar application to the Court of Criminal Appeal refused - Whether application properly made in the Circuit Court.
A sentence of imprisonment was imposed upon the accused in the Circuit Court, but was suspended by the Court of Criminal Appeal on his entering into a recognisance to keep the peace and be of good behaviour for a period of two years. The accused broke the recognisance by committing an offence for which he was sentenced to a term of imprisonment. The Circuit Court Judge refused to hear an application for an order that he serve his suspended sentence on the completion of the sentence he was then serving. An application, by motion on notice, was made to the Court of Criminal Appeal for an order that the accused be ordered at the expiration of the said sentence to serve the suspended sentence and for an order that his recognisance be estreated, or, in the alternative, for an order giving directions to the Circuit Court Judge as to the enforcement of the said order suspended by the Court of Criminal Appeal.
Held by the Court of Criminal Appeal, refusing the application, that the Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction under s. 34 of the Courts of Justice Act, 1924, had allowed the conviction to stand, but had varied the sentence imposed by the Circuit Court Judge by suspending it and once the Court had done this it had completed its task in the case and there was no ground for...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
DPP v Anthony Foley
...ACT 2006 S99(9) CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2006 S99(10) COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT 1924 S34 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 1993 S3 AG, PEOPLE v GRIMES 1955 IR 315 1 FREWEN 496 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2006 S99(12) CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 1993 S2 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 1993 S2(3) COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT 1924 S34 CRIM......
-
Heaphy v The Governor of Cork Prison
...any application to revoke the suspension was made to the court of trial and not to the Court of Criminal Appeal: The People (At the Suit of the Attorney General) v. Peter Grimes [1955] I.R. 315. However the procedure is now regulated by statute and any application to revoke a sentence suspe......
-
State (P. Woods) v Attorney General
...23 Cr. App. Rep. 193. 29 [1937] I.R. 428. 30 [1943] I.R. 115. 31 [1944] I.R. 66. 32 (1952) 36 Cr. App. Rep. 64. 33 [1951] I.R. 172. 34 [1955] I.R. 315. 35 [1957] I.R. 36 [1962] I.R. 248. 37 [1963] I.R. 348. 38 [1964] I.R. 80. 39 (1823) 1 B. & C. 711. 40 (1826) 5 B. & C. 395. 41 (1837) 7 Ad.......
-
DPP v Foley
...PROCEDURE ACT 1993 S3 COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT 1924 S34 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1993 S2(3) AG, PEOPLE v CAROLAN 1943 IJ 49 AG, PEOPLE v GRIMES 1955 IR 315 1 FREWEN 496 COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT 1924 S29 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2006 S22 DPP v MCCARTHY & ORS UNREP CCA 16.6.2010 2010/16/3808 2010 IECCA 51 ......