R v R

JurisdictionIreland
JudgeMr. Justice McMohan
Judgment Date12 January 1979
Neutral Citation1978 WJSC-HC 502
Docket NumberNo. 243 Sp Ct./1978
CourtHigh Court
Date12 January 1979

1978 WJSC-HC 502

THE HIGH COURT

No. 243 Sp Ct./1978
R. v. R.
IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIED WOMENS STATUS ACT 1957

BETWEEN:

R
Plaintiff

and

R
Defendant
1

Judgment of Mr. Justice McMohan delivered the 12th day of January 1979

2

These proceedings are brought by the wife who is the Plaintiff by a Special Summons claiming an Order under Section 12 Married Womens Status Act 1957declaring that she is entitled to the sole beneficial interest in the family home or alternatively determining the extent of her beneficial interest in the premises.

3

The parties were married in March 1968. They had been going together for some years before marriage. The husband is a machine operator in a Dublin firm. The wife was aged eighteen on marriage and the husband was some years older than his wife.

4

For the first year of their marriage the parties lived in a mobile home which the husband had acquired. He then brought a home in a County Dublin village by means of a mortgage. He obtained some of the money for the deposit of £500 by the sale of the mobile home and some by borrowing from a Credit Union. The House was purchased in the husband's name.

5

There were no children of the marriage. The parties seperated and the marriage broke up in September 1973. The family home has been sold with the wife's consent and the nett proceeds are held by the husband's solicitor pending the outcome of these proceedings. The wife has resumed employment and has not made any claim on the husband for maintenance.

6

Before the marriage the wife held various jobs and she continued to work after marriage. The records of the Department of Social Welfare which have been proved show that between July 1968 and July 1973 the wife was employed for a total of 166 weeks, that is, an average of 33 weeks per year. The wife claims that the money she earned was spent on her own necessaries and on meeting the expenses of the household and in that way her earnings helped her husband to meet the mortgage repayments on the house and she is therefore entitled to a beneficial interest in the proceeds of the sale. The husband swore an affidavit in which he said that after they were married his wife worked for short periods only and all the money which she earned was spent on herself on make-up, buying clothes and having her hair done. Faced with the records of the wife's employment from the Department of Social Welfare the husband retreated somewhat from...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Doran v Delaney
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 25 November 1998
    ...COUNCIL 1980 1 WLR 433 PERRY V SIDNEY PHILLIPS & SON 1982 3 AER 702 QUINN V QUALITY HOMES LTD 1976–1977 ILRM 314 RIORDANS TRAVEL V ACRES 1979 ILRM 1 ROCHE V PEILOW UNREP CARROLL 8.7.1986 1986/8/1643 Synopsis Damages Assessment of damages; sale of land; defective title in portion of the pr......
1 books & journal articles
  • 'Til death do us part? : Cohabitees and the law
    • Ireland
    • Irish Judicial Studies Journal No. 2-2, July 2002
    • 1 July 2002
    ...court to ignore very minor contributions made by the claimant. 18 This method of quantification was used by the High Court in R. v. R. [1979] I.L.R.M. 1 (McMahon J.). 195 Judicial Studies Institute Journal [2:2 method was further honed by Carroll J. in G.N.R. v. K.A.R.19where she said in ca......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT