Rahill v Brady
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 31 July 1971 |
| Date | 31 July 1971 |
| Docket Number | [1969. No. 123 SS.] |
| Court | Supreme Court |
(S.C.)
Rahill
and
Brady
Special event -Sales at livestock mart held twice weekly - Statute - Interpretation - Ordinary meaning of word -Appeal - Point of law - Question of law and fact - Intoxicating Liquor Act, 1962 (No. 21), s.11, sub-s. 1.
Thomas Brady was the holder, as nominee, of a licence for the sale of intoxicating liquor at an hotel in County Cavan. On application to the District Court he obtained an order authorising him to sell intoxicating liquor at a livestock mart, to which no licence was attached, in the town of Cavan on each Tuesday and Thursday in the month of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
26 cases
-
Mitek Holdings Ltd (Formerly known as Antigen Holdings Ltd) and Others v Companies Act
...OF INVESTIGATIONS COMPANIES ACT 1990 S150 COMPANIES ACT 1990 S150(4B) COMPANY LAW ENFORCEMENT ACT 2001 S56 RSC O.74 r46 RAHILL v BRADY 1971 IR 69 MAXWELL INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES 12ED COMPANIES ACT 1990 S150(4A) COMPANY LAW ENFORCEMENT ACT 2001 S41 COMPANY LAW ENFORCEMENT ACT 2001 S56(2)......
-
Doherty v Governor of Portlaoise Prison
...V STARDUST VICTIMS COMPENSATION TRIBUNAL 1986 IR 642 O'KEEFFE V BORD PLEANALA 1993 IR 39 MCGRATH V MCDERMOTT 1988 IR 258 RAHILL V BRADY 1971 IR 69 AG, PEOPLE V MCGLYNN 1967 IR 232 RAFFERTY V CROWLEY 1984 ILRM 350 NESTOR V MURPHY 1979 IR 326 LUKE V INLAND REVENUE COMMISSIONERS 1963 AC ......
-
Monahan v Legal Aid Board
...for the Marine (Unreported, High Court, Keane J., 4th November, 1994). M.O'C. v. Minister for Health [2002] 1 I.R. 234. Rahill v. Brady [1971] I.R. 69. Salomon v. Salomon and Co. Ltd. [1897] A.C. 22; 66 L.J. Ch. 35; 75 L.T. 426; 13 T.L.R. 46; 41 S.J. 63; 4 Mans. 89; 45 W.R. 193. Tinkham v. ......
-
DPP v Cawley
...Dublin (1903) 37 I.L.T.R. R. v. Penwith Justices, Ex parte Hay, Pender and Perkes [1979] 1 C.A.R. (S) 265; 123 S.J. 621. Rahill v. Brady [1971] I.R. 69. Regina v. Campbell, Ex parte Hoy [1953] 1 Q.B. 585 ; [1953] 2 W.L.R. 578 ; [1953] 1 All E.R. 684. Reid v. Reid [1886] 31 Ch. D. 402; 55 L.......
Get Started for Free