Re JR, a Ward of Court
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | High Court |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1993 |
| Date | 01 January 1993 |
- Wardship - Dwelling house - Order of sale - Claim to an interest - Representation by ward - Detriment -Imperfect gift - Constructive trust.
On 8 October, 1990, J.R. was made a ward of court when the General Solicitor was appointed committee of his person and estate. In 1978, whilst receiving hospital treatment for a psychiatric illness, the ward formed a relationship with the respondent, who was a fellow patient. The ward invited the respondent to go and live with him in his house. He assured her that he would look after her and that she would be sure of a home for the rest of her life. On 2 November, 1988, the ward made a will leaving all his property to the respondent. He handed the will to her and said "it's not my house now, it's our house and eventually it will be your house". The couple lived together until July, 1990. During this time the ward maintained the respondent and gave her a small allowance to augment her disability...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
PRENDERGAST v McLAUGHLIN
...v. McCarron (Unreported, Supreme Court, 13th February, 1997). Moynihan v. Greensmyth [1977] I.R. 55. In re J.R., a ward of court [1993] I.L.R.M. 657. Reidy v. McGreevy (Unreported, High Court, Barron J., 19th March, 1993). Civil liability - Limitation period - Death - Promissory estoppel - ......
-
Naylor v Maher
...UNREP SUPREME 13.2.1997 1997/4/1414 FULTON v ANDREW 1875 LR 7HL 448 BEGLEY v MCHUGH 1939 IR 479 LEAHY v CORBOY 1969 IR 148 JR IN RE 1993 ILRM 657 GILLETTE v HOLT 2000 AER (D) 299 2001 CH 210 2000 2 AER 289 FULLER v STRUM 2002 1 WLR 1097 CRAIG v LAOUREUX 1920 AC 349 SCAMMELL v FARMER 2008 ......
-
Tennant v Reidy
...contractual relationship is not necessary for the successful invocation of the doctrine of estoppel – see In Re JR, a Ward of Court [1993] ILRM 657. The Receiver says that does not really avail the Reidys because in that case, Costello J. was talking about non-legal relationships that may i......
-
S.D v M.L
...CHILDREN ACT 1976 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE FAMILY LAW ACT 1995 BETWEEN S.D. APPLICANT AND M.L. RESPONDENT R (J) (A WARD OF COURT), IN RE 1993 ILRM 657 1993/5/1350 COURTNEY v MCCARTHY 2008 2 IR 376 2007/11/2296 2007 IESC 58 AMALGAMATED INVESTMENT & PROPERTY CO LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) v TEXAS C......