Re Ringsend Methodist Church Hall; Elliott and The Trustees of the Methodist Church in Ireland v The Commissioner of Valuation

JurisdictionIreland
Judgment Date28 February 1935
Date28 February 1935
CourtHigh Court (Irish Free State)

High Court.

Elliott v. Commissioner of Valuation
In the Matter of a HALL and PREMISES known as RINGSEND METHODIST CHURCH HALL, situateon the Irishtown Road, in the County Borough of Dublin; THE REV. ROBERT J. ELLIOTTand THE TRUSTEES ON BEHALF OF THE METHODIST CHURCH IN IRELAND
Appellants
and
THE COMMISSIONER OF VALUATION, Respondent(1)

Local Government- Rates - Hall adjoining a Methodist Church - Used in connection therewith for the holding of Sunday School and for other parochial purposes - Used occasionally for concerts - Proceeds applied to meet expenses of hall and cost of construction or given to foreign missions - No private profit derived from Hall - Rateability - "Building exclusively dedicated to religious worship or exclusively used for the education of the poor" - "Building used exclusively for charitable purposes" - Poor Relief (Ir,) Act, 1838 (1 & 2 Vict, c. 56), sects. 61 and 63 - Valuation (Ir.) Act, 1852 (15 & 16 Vict, c. 63), sect. 16 - Valuation (Ir.) Act, 1854 (17Vict. c. 8), sect. 2.

Appeal from the Circuit Court.

The premises, the subject of this appeal, consisted of a hall constructed in the year 1932 at a cost of £1,100 raised by voluntary subscriptions. It adjoined the Methodist Church at Ringsend, being built against one wall of the Church and

upon a plot of ground held under the same lease. Both Church and hall were vested in Trustees upon the statutory trusts contained in the Schedule to the Methodist Church Act, 1928.

The hall was valued at £10 as appeared from the List of Valuations made out pursuant to sect. 17 of the Valuation (Ir.) Act, 1852. Notice of objection was lodged but the Commissioner of Valuation refused to alter the said valuation. Accordingly in the lists of revised valuations for the City of Dublin, dated the 28th September, 1933, the valuation of the hall was stated to be £10.

Against this valuation the plaintiffs, the Rev. Robert J. Elliott and the Trustees, appealed to the Judge of the Circuit Court.

Evidence was given at the hearing before the Circuit Court Judge by the Rev. William Loftus Coade, Minister of the Ringsend Church, that the hall was constructed in 1932, and that it was used on Sundays for morning Sunday School, attended by about 70 children, and in the afternoon for religious instruction called "Junior Christian Endeavour,"attended by about 30 children, and "Intermediate Christian Endeavour," at both of which the education was entirely religious, consisting of Bible Study and the Methodist Catechism. During the week the Girls' Brigade held their meetings there; each meeting began with a Bible class. The Boys' Brigade used it as a drill hall. All such meetings opened and closed with prayer. The members of the congregation who used the hall were all of the working class. Social meetings, jumble sales and concerts, were also occasionally held in it. The proceeds were applied to meet the expenses of the hall and the reduction of debt incurred in its construction. A credit balance of £15 realised in 1933 was given to foreign missions. No private profit was derived from the use of the hall.

A hall adjoining a Methodist Church was used for parochial purposes in connection with the Church. On Sunday mornings Sunday school was held there and in the afternoon religious instruction called "Christian Endeavour" was given, both being entirely religious, consisting of Bible study and the Methodist...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Maynooth College, Trustees of v Commissioner of Valuation
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 31 juillet 1958
    ...College were not used for the advancement of religion within the meaning of the same proviso. Elliott v. Commissioner of ValuationIR, [1935] I.R. 607, followed. (3) The buildings were not used for charitable purposes as being for the general benefit of the community as their user by the sta......
  • Brendan v Commissioner of Valuation
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 30 mai 1969
    ...the meaning of s. 63 of the Act of 1838, the convent did not qualify for exemption on that ground. Elliott v. Commissioner of ValuationIR[1935] I.R. 607 applied. 4. That the oratory did not qualify for exemption as the community derived a direct private use from it. Brendan v. Commissioner ......
  • Campbell College, Belfast (Governors) v Northern Ireland Valuation Commissioner
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 21 avril 1964
    ...that have thought it right to follow it (as for instance, Mc. Gahan and Ryan v. Commissioner of Valuation 1934 I.R. 736, Elliott v. Commissioner of Valuation 1935 I.R. 607), I will indicate briefly where I think the reasoning to be 40The learned Judge says at the outset that the collocati......
  • Tearfund Ireland Ltd v Commissioner of Valuation
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 28 juillet 2021
    ...v. Commissioner of Valuation [1934] IR 736; Elliott and the Trustees of the Methodist Church in Ireland v. The Commissioner of Valuation [1935] IR 607; Barrington's Hospital v. Commissioner of Valuation [1953] IR 299; Trustees of the College of Maynooth v. Commissioner of Valuation [1958] I......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT