Re The Matter of The Estate of Edward Sandiford Power, Owner; Francis Carleton Reeves, Petitioner

JurisdictionIreland
Judgment Date12 November 1860
Date12 November 1860
CourtCourt of Appeal in Chancery (Ireland)

Ch. Appeal.

In re the Matter of the Estate of EDWARD SANDIFORD POWER,
Owner;

FRANCIS CARLETON REEVES,
Petitioner.

CHANCERY REPORTS. 295 judgment into a mortgage, under the provisions of the 13 & 14 1860. Ch. Appeal. Vie.. c. 29, was invalid, upon the ground (among others) that In re it did not contain a sufficient description of the plaintiff. The EDGEWORTH'S affidavit contained, as a description of the plaintiff, the following ESTATE. statement, "that deponent was, and still is, a gentleman." That Argument. is not a sufficient description to satisfy the requirements of the 6th section of the Act, which enacts that the affidavit shall set forth " the title, trade or profession of the plaintiff." It cannot be inferred that the plaintiff meant to make averment of his title by stating that he was a gentleman. Mr. Lawson and Mr. Cathrew, for the respondent, were not heard. Per Curiam. It does not appear that the plaintiff had any trade or profession ; and in that case it is difficult to conceive how he could better have described his title than he has done. This affidavit is good, and the order of the Court below must be affirmed. Judgment. In re the Matter of the Estate of EDWARD SANDIFORD POWER, Owner; FRANCIS CARLETON REEVES, Petitioner. Nov. 11, 12. Tins was an appeal on behalf of F. C. Reeves, against an order The owner of made by Judge Dobbs in the Landed Estates Court, disallowing in the Landed an estate sold Estates Court a judgment mortgage as an incumbrance upon the lands sold in was held to be estopped from this matter. objecting, upon the set tlement of the final schedule of incumbrances, to a claim which he had admitted, in his affidavit filed as an answer to the conditional order for sale, to be a charge upon the estate. He had also suffered the the conditional order to be made absolute, and a sale to be had, without disputing the claim in question. Au inclunbrancer cannot avail himself of an objection filed by another party to the validity of a claim, to which he has not himself filed an objection. 296 CHANCERY REPORTS. In Easter Term 1857, F. C. Reeves obtained a judgment against the owner, which he registered as a mortgage on the 27th of April following. In 1858, F. C. Reeves filed a petition in the Landed Estates Court for a sale of the lands. A conditional order for a sale was made, and served on the owner, who filed an affidavit as cause against the conditional order, in which he stated that he had made arrangements to raise...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • The Estate of The Assignees of John Driscoll, A Bankrupt, Owners, ex parte The Assignees of John Driscoll, Petitioners
    • Ireland
    • Incumbered Estates Court (Ireland)
    • 13 March 1867
    ...BANKRUPT, OWNERS, EX PARTE THE ASSIGNEES OF JOHN DRISCOLL, PETITIONERS. In re Powerƒ€™s Estate 11 Ir. Ch. R. 295. Eyre v. Mƒ€™Dowell 9 H. of L. Ca. 619. Sumpter v. CooperENR 2 B. & Ad. 223. Garry v. SharrattENR ......
  • Re Nixon's Estate
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal in Chancery (Ireland)
    • 17 December 1874
    ...App. IN RE NIXON'S ESTATE. Sterndale v. HankinsonENR 1 Sim. 393. In re Power's EstateUNK 11 Ir. Ch. Rep. 295. In re Colclough's EstateUNK 8 Ir. Ch. Rep. 330. Bennett v. Bernard 12 Ir. Ch. R. 229. Berrington v. Evans 1 Yo & Coll. (Exch.) 434. Carroll v. DarcyUNK 10 Ir. Eq. Rep. 321. Landed E......
  • Re The Estate of James Cuthbert Flood, Owner and Petitioner; Elizabeth Rooney and Mary Avenal Rooney, Appellants; Maurice Saleman, Respondent
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal in Chancery (Ireland)
    • 28 November 1865
    ...FLOOD,Owner and Petitioner;ELIZABETH ROONEY and MARY AVENAL ROONEY,Appellants;MAURICE SALEMAN,Respondent. In re Power's EstateUNK 11 Ir. Ch. Rep. 295. Calvert v. GaudyENR 1 Phil. 518. Downing v. HodderUNK 12 Ir. Eq. Rep. 371. Gainsford v. Griffith 1 Saund. Rep. 57, 58. Duncan v. BradyIR 12 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT