Re Walshe
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | High Court |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1962 |
| Date | 01 January 1962 |
(H.C.)
In re Walshe
Objections to taxation -Application for review - New grounds of objection submitted on hearing of review - Rules of the Supreme Court, 1905, O. 65, r. 66 (1), (2), 3.
On an application to the High Court to review the rulings of the Taxing Master on objections brought against the taxation of a bill of costs, the party seeking the review is confined to the grounds of objections against the taxation which were made before the Taxing Master, and new grounds of objection may not be...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 cases
-
The Minister for Finance v Laurence Goodman, Goodman International and Subsidiary Companies (No. 2)
...Master could not be entertained on the hearing of the review. O'Sullivan v. HughesDLRM [1986] ILRM 555 and In re Kevin J. WalsheDLTR (1962) 96 I.L.T.R. 173 followed. 8. That as a matter of common sense and practicality, it would be absurd to adopt a different approach to the taxation of the......
-
Leech v Independent Newspapers (Ireland) Ltd
...cannot entertain a review on grounds that were not brought in before the Taxing Master at the objections stage. 52 In Re Walshe [1962] 96 I.L.T.R. 173, Budd J. stated as follows in relation to this principle: “It has however been contended that the Court is not confined in its review of the......
-
Minister for Finance v Goodman (& Others)
...in support of the contention he had erred, being advanced on the review and relied on the decision in In re. Kevin J. Walshe, (1962) 96 I.L.T.R. 173 and the decision in O’Sullivan -v- Hughes, [1986] I.L.R.M. 555 in support of the objection. In In re. Kevin J. Walshe, which was a decision wh......
-
The Minister for Finance v Laurence Goodman, Goodman International and Subsidiary Companies (No 1)
...180; (1974) 109 I.L.T.R. 101. Heffernan v. Heffernan (Unreported, High Court, Gannon J., 2nd December, 1974). In re Kevin J. Walshe (1962) 96 I.L.T.R. 173. Kelly v. Breen [1978] I.L.R.M. 63. Kelly (an infant) v. Hoey (Unreported, High Court, Butler J., 2nd December, 1973). Lavan v. Walsh (N......
Get Started for Free