Re Walshe
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Court | High Court |
Judgment Date | 01 January 1962 |
Date | 01 January 1962 |
Objections to taxation -Application for review - New grounds of objection submitted on hearing of review - Rules of the Supreme Court, 1905, O. 65, r. 66 (1), (2), 3.
On an application to the High Court to review the rulings of the Taxing Master on objections brought against the taxation of a bill of costs, the party seeking the review is confined to the grounds of objections against the taxation which were made before the Taxing Master, and new grounds of objection may not be introduced or considered on the hearing of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
The Minister for Finance v Laurence Goodman, Goodman International and Subsidiary Companies (No. 2)
...Master could not be entertained on the hearing of the review. O'Sullivan v. HughesDLRM [1986] ILRM 555 and In re Kevin J. WalsheDLTR (1962) 96 I.L.T.R. 173 followed. 8. That as a matter of common sense and practicality, it would be absurd to adopt a different approach to the taxation of the......
-
Minister for Finance v Goodman (& Others)
...in support of the contention he had erred, being advanced on the review and relied on the decision in In re. Kevin J. Walshe, (1962) 96 I.L.T.R. 173 and the decision in O’Sullivan -v- Hughes, [1986] I.L.R.M. 555 in support of the objection. In In re. Kevin J. Walshe, which was a decision wh......
-
The Minister for Finance v Laurence Goodman, Goodman International and Subsidiary Companies (No 1)
...180; (1974) 109 I.L.T.R. 101. Heffernan v. Heffernan (Unreported, High Court, Gannon J., 2nd December, 1974). In re Kevin J. Walshe (1962) 96 I.L.T.R. 173. Kelly v. Breen [1978] I.L.R.M. 63. Kelly (an infant) v. Hoey (Unreported, High Court, Butler J., 2nd December, 1973). Lavan v. Walsh (N......
-
Monica Leech v Independent Newspapers Ireland Ltd
...Ní Raifeartaigh J held that the general prohibition on raising new objections/arguments in the High Court described in Re Walshe (1962) 96 ILTR 173 and subsequent cases did apply to the appellant in the circumstances of this case and the trial judge was correct so to conclude. Ní Raifeartai......