Repayment Mortgage Decision Reference 2023-0006

Case OutcomeRejected
Subject MatterRepayment Mortgage
Reference2023-0006
Date18 January 2023
Finantial SectorBanking
Conducts Complained OfLevel of contact or communications re. Arrears,Dissatisfaction with customer service
Decision Ref:
2023-0006
Sector:
Banking
Product / Service:
Repayment Mortgage
Conduct(s) complained of:
Level of contact or communications re. Arrears
Dissatisfaction with customer service
Outcome:
Rejected
LEGALLY BINDING DECISION OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND PENSIONS OMBUDSMAN
The complaint concerns a mortgage loan.
The Complainants’ Case
The Complainants state that, on 4th June 2019, they received a letter from the Provider
stating that their mortgage loan was in arrears and requesting they “arrange correction of
the account”. The Complainants state that they held their mortgage with a different
provider, and upon an exchange of information with the Provider, they discovered that their
original lender had sold their mortgage to the Provider, without informing them.
The Complainants state that, not having received notice of the sale of the mortgage loan
prior to this correspondence, they had continued to make payments to the original lender
with no issue”. The Complainants state that they proffered evidence of these payments to
the Provider, and that the Provider “acknowledged the error and agreed to correct our
account”.
The Complainants outline that the statements received from the Provider, reference arrears
and arrears payments, and they contend that “there were no arrears on that account when
bought by” the Provider, and that the account was in credit. The Complainants state that,
after allowing three months for the Provider to correct these errors, “ we stopped paying
into the account and advised [the Provider] we would recommence payment, once they
corrected the account”. The Complainants state that the Provider has not yet corrected the
errors.
The Complainants state that the Provider has attributed arrears charges to their account
during the time when the Complainants were making payments to the original lender. The
- 2 -
/Cont’d…
Complainants state that the charges were assigned to their account as a result of the
Provider’s actions, which are the cause of the account errors. The Complainants state that
they will not accept these arrears charges on the account, as doing so would be “an inference
that [they] accept the account went into arrears”, where they contend that the account was
not in arrears up until the time the Provider contacted them.
The Provider’s Case
The Provider states that ownership of the Complainants’ mortgage loan account transferred
to the Provider on 30th November 2018, with an arrears balance of €0 and a credit balance
of €2,439.64. The Provider sets out that correspondence was sent to the Complainants on
11th December 2018 informing them that the Provider was the new lender of record, as
communicated a week earlier to the Complainants in a letter sent by the original lender
dated 4th December 2018.
The Provider states that, after “a number of failed attempts to contact” the Complainants
by telephone on 4th May 2019 and 20th May 2019, the Provider contacted the Complainants
by email on 5th June 2019. The Provider says that the Complainants were informed that their
account was in arrears, they were furnished with correct payment details, and asked for
confirmation of payments made to the original lender.
The Provider states that on 5th June 2019, its Finance Department conducted a review of the
account and payment transfers from the original lender. It says that on completion of the
review, two payments from the original lender were confirmed for 28th February 2019 and
31st May 2019 and that no other payments were transferred from the original lender. The
Provider sets out that it requested that the Complainants contact the original lender directly
in relation to the payments said to have been made on 2nd September 2019, and that the
Provider raised a query with the original lender on 29th October 2019 and 14th November
2019.
The Provider states in the original lender’s response to its query, the original lender
confirmed eight payments made to the Complainants’ account so that, as of 18th November
2019, the Complainants’ account was displaying a credit balance of €886.89.
The Provider outlines that, while the terminology in its statements does reference arrears,
the amounts on the statement dated 2nd January 2020 were negative figures, which
indicated that the Complainants’ account was in credit.
The Provider states that it received no repayments from the Complainants from 2nd August
2019 and that, as a result, the account is in arrears. The Provider asserts that it contacted
the Complainants on 1st April 2020 to state that the Complainants’ account required urgent
and immediate attention” and that repayments are expected under the terms of the Letter
of Loan Offer dated 4th October 2006. The Provider states that, as of 14th July 2020, there
was an outstanding arrears balance of €8,703.71.
The Complaint for Adjudication

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT