Rose v Rose

CourtHouse of Lords (Ireland)
Judgment Date15 July 1897
Date15 July 1897



H. L.

Will — Construction — Estate tail or estate for life.

478 THE IRISH REPORTS. [1897. Ross, J. A similar form of request mutatis mutandis was issued in 1897. TRUSTEES OF OWEN'S ESTATE. In re HERBERT'S ESTATE. In re OWEN'S ESTATE. Solicitors having carriage in HERBERT'S ESTATE : Webb, Scott, 8f Seymour. Solicitors having carriage in TRUSTEES OF OWEN'S ESTATE : Baker 4 Ringwood. W. G. x L. ROSE v. ROSE. 1897. July 15. Will—Construction—Estate tail or estate for life. APPEAL by the plaintiff from the judgment of the Court of Appeal, affirming the judgment of the Master of the Rolls, ante, page 9. Cozens-Hardy, Q.C. (of the English Bar), S. Ronan, Q.C., and H. D. Conner, for the appellant. Haldane, Q.C., Right Hon. H. H. Asquith (both of the English Bar), and John Leech, for the respondents, were not called on. THEIR...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT