Sergeant O'Mahoney

 
FREE EXCERPT

1998 WJSC-CMAC 11585

THE COURTS-MARTIAL APPEAL COURT

O'Flaherty J.,

Moriarty J.,

Kelly J.,

(2cm/96)
SERGEANT O'MAHONEY
AN CH ÚIRT ACHOMHAIRC ARM-CHUIRTEANNA
SERGEANT DENIS O'MAHONY
Appellant

Citations:

DEFENCE ACTS 1954 – 1990 S131

DEFENCE FORCE REGS A.18 REG 24(a)

O'Flaherty J.
[NEM DISS]
1

This is an appeal brought on behalf of Sergeant O'Mahony from the verdict reached by a limited court-martial which was held in Collin's Barracks, Cork, on the 19th October, 1995, the date of promulgation of which was the 26th January, 1996.

2

The offence charged was that Sergeant O'Mahony disobeyed a lawful order of a superior officer contrary to s.131 of the Defence Acts,1954to 1990.It is stated that Sergeant O'Mahony, having been detailed on 16th March, 1995, by Captain M. Doyle, Southern Command Headquarters, to attend a volleyball championship at the Curragh Camp, Co. Kildare, on the 24th March, 1995, did not do so.

3

The wording of s. 131 of the Defence Act is as follows:-

"Every person subject to military law who disobeys a lawful command of a superior officer is guilty of an offence against military law and shall, on conviction by court-martial, be liable to suffer penal servitude or any less punishment awardable by a court-martial."

4

The words that have to be emphasised are "who disobeys the command ofa superior officer" - not of his immediate superior officer but of a superior officer. He was found guilty of the offence and was fined the sum of £190.

5

Four points have been taken before us. The first, which the Court regards as the substantial one, is that there was not a proper line of command as regards the transmission of the request. He was told, to use a neutral term for the moment, that he should present himself at the volleyball championship. Then there was objection made to the President of the court-martial which was disallowed. There is fault found with the Judge-Advocate's summing up in rather broad terms. The fourth point is that this was such a minor infraction, if it was an infraction, that it should have been dealt with as an administrative matter. It did not justify the invocation of the full paraphernalia of a court-martial to try this matter as a criminal offence, an offence in the criminal mould against military law...

To continue reading

REQUEST YOUR TRIAL