State (Hully) v Hynes
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1966 |
| Date | 01 January 1966 |
(S.C.)
State (Hully)
and
Hynes
English citizen resident in Eire - Charges of offences in England contrary to the Forgery Act, 1913 - Whether a cloak for revenue offences - English warrant endorsed for execution by Deputy Commissioner of the Garda Siochána - Warrant endorsed for execution in Dublin and Wicklow - Arrest under warrant -Validity of endorsements and backing of warrant - Retirement from the Garda Siochana of Garda who endorsed warrant - Whether warrant bad on its face - Retirement of Garda Officer to whom conditional order of habeas corpus directed -Whether prosecutor detained in accordance with law - Petty...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
10 cases
-
N and Another v Health Service Executive and Others
...BALLYMUN GARDA STATION 1991 IR 189 CIRPACI (ORSE MCCORMACK) v MIN JUSTICE 2005 2 ILRM 547 2005/10/2112 HULLY, STATE v HYNES 1966 100 ILTR 145 NICOLAOU, STATE v BORD UCHTALA 1966 IR 567 CAHILL v SUTTON 1980 IR 269 GUARDIANSHIP OF INFANTS ACT 1964 S11 OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY CONCISE ED M (P......
-
Child and Family Agency v McG and JC
...at 162 that a judge must examine any ground that might render detention unlawful and of Kingsmill Moore J in The State (Hully) v Hynes (1966) 100 ILTR 145 at 163 that in habeas corpus a ‘very wide field of enquiry is open to the court’. The High Court can follow any procedures which admit o......
-
Byrne v Conroy
...Cheng [1973] A.C. 931. Roquette Frères v. French Customs Administration (Case 145/79) [1980] E.C.R. 2917. The State (Hully) v. Hynes (1961) 100 I.L.T.R. 145. The State (McFadden) v. Governor of Mountjoy Prison [1981] I.L.R.M. 113. Thomson v. Goold & Co. [1910] A.C. 409. Von Colson and Kaman......
-
A.B. v The Clinical Director of St. Loman's Hospital
...162 that a judge must examine any ground that might render detention unlawful and of Kingsmill Moore J. in The State (Hully) v Hynes (1966) 100 I.L.T.R. 145 at 163 that in habeas corpus a "very wide field of enquiry is open to the court". The High Court can follow any procedures which admit......
Get Started for Free
