State (Quinn) v Ryan
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1966 |
| Date | 01 January 1966 |
| Docket Number | (1963. 69 S.S.) |
| Court | Supreme Court |
(S.C.)
State (Quinn)
and
Ryan and Another
Validity - Arrest on English warrant - Habeas Corpus - Release on order of High Court - Re-arrest on fresh warrant and immediate removal from jurisdiction - Denial of opportunity to question validity of warrant -Conduct of police officers - Contempt of Court -Constitution of Ireland, Art. 40, 50 - Petty Sessions (Ireland) Act, 1851, ss. 26, 29.
Sect. 29 of the Petty Sessions (Ireland) Act, 1851, which authorises the backing of British warrants in Ireland...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
230 cases
-
R v W
...34.1, Article 34.3.1 and Article 40.3 of the Constitution, but as (the not altogether dissimilar case of) The State (Quinn) v. Ryan [ [1965] I.R. 70] itself shows, albeit in a different context, it is a cornerstone of a democratic state based on the rule of law. One might equally observe th......
-
State (Trimbole) v The Governor of Mountjoy Prison
...citizens do not for themselves or their superiors obtain the planned results of that invasion. Principles in The State (Quinn)v. RyanIR [1965] I.R. 70; The People (Attorney General) v. O'BrienIR [1965] I.R. 142 and The People v. LynchIR [1982] I.R. 64 affirmed. 2. The well recognised jurisd......
-
Conway v Irish National Teachers Organisation
...LIABILITY ACT 1961 S14(4) BROOME V CASSELL & CO 1972 AC 1027 DILLON V DUNNES STORES & ORS UNREP SUPREME 20.12.68 QUINN, STATE V RYAN 1965 IR 70 CONSTITUTION ART 42.4 UREN V FAIRFAX & SONS LTD 1967 ALR 25 AUSTRALIA CONSOLIDATED PRESS LTD V UREN 1969 1 AC 590 DPP, PEOPLE V KENNY 1990 ILRM......
-
Krupecki v The Minister for Justice and Equality No.2
...reasons as opposed to quashing the decision. The doctrine that a point not argued is a point not decided ( The State (Quinn) v. Ryan [1965] I.R. 70 at 120) applies here. Submissions that the statute requires reasons 7 Mr. Lynn submits that there is a heightened obligation to set out reason......
Get Started for Free
14 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...South Wales v. The Commonwealth (1909) C.L.R. 179, 186. ......488 The State v. Nafiu Rabiu (1980) 8-11 S.C. 130. 562 The State v. Ryan (1965) 1 I R 70 ........16 The Two Friends, (1799) 1 C. Rob. Ad. Rep. 280. ......408 Thomas v. Thomas (1947) A.C. 484 at 487-488. ................................
-
Constitutional Limits on Bills of Rights Introduced by a State or Territory
...399 (Lord Diplock); Nilabati Bahera v State of Orissa (1993) Cri LJ 2899, 2912 (Anand J) (Supreme Court of India); State (Quinn) v Ryan [1965] IR 70, 122 (Ó Dálaigh CJ) (Irish Supreme Court); Byrne v Ireland [1972] IR 241 (Walsh J) (Irish Supreme Court). 47 Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT) pream......
-
Trials in absentia and the cuts to criminal legal aid
...N. Padfield, ‘Transforming Legal Aid’ (2013) Arch Rev 5 at 6.233. RvMullen [2000] QB 520 at 534C–D (Rose LJ).234. The State (Quinn) vRyan [1965] IR 70, 122 (O´Da´laigh CJ).235. RvBertrand (1867) LR 1 PC 520 at 534.236. O. Bowcott, ‘Criminal Legal Aid Fee Cuts for Lawyers Confirmed by Justic......
-
The Case for an Originalist Approach to Constitutional Interpretation in Ireland
...area constitutes a search... This assures 28 Illinois 497 US 62, 95-96, per Justice Scalia dissenting. 29 See State (Quinn) v Ryan [1965] IR 70. 30 Kyllo v United States 533 US 27 (2001). [Vol. 13 2010] An Originalist Approach to Constitutional Interpretation in Ireland preservation of that......
Get Started for Free