State (Quinn) v Ryan
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1966 |
| Docket Number | (1963. 69 S.S.) |
| Date | 01 January 1966 |
(S.C.)
State (Quinn)
and
Ryan and Another
Validity - Arrest on English warrant - Habeas Corpus - Release on order of High Court - Re-arrest on fresh warrant and immediate removal from jurisdiction - Denial of opportunity to question validity of warrant -Conduct of police officers - Contempt of Court -Constitution of Ireland, Art. 40, 50 - Petty Sessions (Ireland) Act, 1851, ss. 26, 29.
-
Sect. 29 of the Petty Sessions (Ireland) Act, 1851, which authorises the backing of British warrants in Ireland...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
228 cases
-
R v W
...34.1, Article 34.3.1 and Article 40.3 of the Constitution, but as (the not altogether dissimilar case of) The State (Quinn) v. Ryan [ [1965] I.R. 70] itself shows, albeit in a different context, it is a cornerstone of a democratic state based on the rule of law. One might equally observe th......
-
Conway v Irish National Teachers Organisation
...LIABILITY ACT 1961 S14(4) BROOME V CASSELL & CO 1972 AC 1027 DILLON V DUNNES STORES & ORS UNREP SUPREME 20.12.68 QUINN, STATE V RYAN 1965 IR 70 CONSTITUTION ART 42.4 UREN V FAIRFAX & SONS LTD 1967 ALR 25 AUSTRALIA CONSOLIDATED PRESS LTD V UREN 1969 1 AC 590 DPP, PEOPLE V KENNY 1990 ILRM......
-
Krupecki v The Minister for Justice and Equality No.2
...reasons as opposed to quashing the decision. The doctrine that a point not argued is a point not decided ( The State (Quinn) v. Ryan [1965] I.R. 70 at 120) applies here. Submissions that the statute requires reasons 7 Mr. Lynn submits that there is a heightened obligation to set out reason......
-
Bula Ltd v Tara Mines Ltd (No. 6)
...V PRIEST 1929 1 KB 655 GREENOUGH V GASKELL 1883 1 MY & K 98 CONSTITUTION ART 40.3.1 HAUGHEY, IN RE 1971 IR 217 QUINN, STATE V RYAN 1965 IR 70 G (D) V EASTERN HEALTH BOARD 1997 3 IR 511 B (D) V MIN FOR JUSTICE 1999 1 IR 29 MCG (G) V W (G) & R (A) UNREP SUPREME 31.3.2000 AMPTHILL PEERAG......
Get Started for Free
12 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...South Wales v. The Commonwealth (1909) C.L.R. 179, 186. ......488 The State v. Nafiu Rabiu (1980) 8-11 S.C. 130. 562 The State v. Ryan (1965) 1 I R 70 ........16 The Two Friends, (1799) 1 C. Rob. Ad. Rep. 280. ......408 Thomas v. Thomas (1947) A.C. 484 at 487-488. ................................
-
Constitutional Limits on Bills of Rights Introduced by a State or Territory
...399 (Lord Diplock); Nilabati Bahera v State of Orissa (1993) Cri LJ 2899, 2912 (Anand J) (Supreme Court of India); State (Quinn) v Ryan [1965] IR 70, 122 (Ó Dálaigh CJ) (Irish Supreme Court); Byrne v Ireland [1972] IR 241 (Walsh J) (Irish Supreme Court). 47 Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT) pream......
-
Trials in absentia and the cuts to criminal legal aid
...N. Padfield, ‘Transforming Legal Aid’ (2013) Arch Rev 5 at 6.233. RvMullen [2000] QB 520 at 534C–D (Rose LJ).234. The State (Quinn) vRyan [1965] IR 70, 122 (O´Da´laigh CJ).235. RvBertrand (1867) LR 1 PC 520 at 534.236. O. Bowcott, ‘Criminal Legal Aid Fee Cuts for Lawyers Confirmed by Justic......
-
The Case for an Originalist Approach to Constitutional Interpretation in Ireland
...area constitutes a search... This assures 28 Illinois 497 US 62, 95-96, per Justice Scalia dissenting. 29 See State (Quinn) v Ryan [1965] IR 70. 30 Kyllo v United States 533 US 27 (2001). [Vol. 13 2010] An Originalist Approach to Constitutional Interpretation in Ireland preservation of that......
Get Started for Free