TA Hotels Ltd Lynams Hotel v Preeti Khoosye

JurisdictionIreland
Judgment Date24 July 2018
Judgment citation (vLex)[2018] 7 JIEC 2403
Date24 July 2018
CourtLabour Court (Ireland)
Docket NumberADJ-00006896 CA-00009334-005,DETERMINATION NO. RPD1810,FULL RECOMMENDATION

Labour Court (Ireland)

FULL RECOMMENDATION

RPA/17/29

DETERMINATION NO. RPD1810

ADJ-00006896 CA-00009334-005

PARTIES:
TA Hotels Ltd Lynams Hotel
and
Preeti Khoosye
DIVISION:

Chairman: Ms O'Donnell

Employer Member: Ms Doyle

Worker Member: Mr McCarthy

REDUNDANCY PAYMENTS ACTS, 1967 TO 2014

SUBJECT:
1

1. Appeal of Adjudication Officer's Decision ADJ-00006896.

BACKGROUND:
2

2. The Employer appealed the Decision of the Adjudication Officer to the Labour Court in accordance with the terms of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 to 2014. A Labour Court hearing took place on 13th July, 2018. The following is the Determination of the Court:

DETERMINATION:
3

This is an appeal by TA Hotels LTD Lynams Hotel against decision ADJ-00006896 of an Adjudication Officer in a complaint by Preeti Khoosye against her former employer TA Hotels Ltd Lynams Hotels. The complaint relates to alleged contraventions of the Redundancy Payments Act 1967 (the Act). The Adjudication Officer found the complaints to be well founded and directed the Respondent to pay the Complainant her statutory entitlements.

4

In line with the normal practice of the Court, the parties are referred to in this Determination as they were at first instance. Hence, Preeti Khoosye is referred to as the Complainant and TA Hotels LTD Lynams Hotel is referred to as the Respondent.

5

At the hearing of the Labour Court scheduled to take place on Friday 13 th July 2018 the Respondents legal representative sought to make an application that the Labour Court would substitute Ms Theresa Andreucetti Company Director for the Company name as the Company had been struck off the register. The Representative for the Complainant handed into the Court a notice of intention to strike off by the Companies Registration Office dated 28 th February 2018 and a further notice of strike off dated 11 th April 2018. It was the Complainant's position as set out by her Representative that once a company is stuck off it ceases to have any legal existence and therefore it could not prosecute an appeal. The Complainant also advised the Court that the fast track process for restoring a Company was no longer available. The Court took a short adjournment to consider the application.

6

The Court having considered the application advised the parties that it had come to the decision that the Court did not in these circumstances have jurisdiction to substitute the name of the Director for the name of the Company which is a Limited...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT