The 'Droit de Suite', An Analysis Across Two Jurisdictions: Cross Fertilisation Towards Inclusivity
Author | Anthony O' Dwyer |
Position | BBS, BCL Phd Candidate UCC |
Pages | 59-78 |
[2013] COLR
59
THE ‘DROIT DE SUITE’, AN ANALYSIS ACROSS TWO JURISDICTIONS: CROSS
FERTILISATION TOWARDS INCLUSIVITY
Anthony O’ Dwyer*
ABSTRACT
The paper will examine the ‘droit de suite’ or artists’ resale right and analyse how it has
been applied in the EU and in Ireland. The paper will also look at moves in the US to adopt
a similar right and assess whether there has been any cross fertilisation of ideas. The
question will also be asked whether the current EU system could learn something from the
proposed US formulation. The compar ison will be conducted under a number of hea dings
which will compare how the right functions in the EU, Ir eland and under the proposed US
provisions. It will conclude with an assessment of the effect of the droit de suite on the EU
market to-date and whether this will have any effect on a future US decision to incorporate
the right into their copyright law.
A INTRODUCTION
The droit de suite is an intellectual property right. It literally means ‘the right to follow’, and
is a further extension of the protection afforded by copyright to the creators of art. These
rights combined respond to a market failure to make socially beneficial activities financially
viable for their creators.
The droit de suite entitles artists and their heirs to retain an interest in all successive
commercial re-sales of their art-work and receive a portion of the selling price.
1 The right is
often referred to as a moral right as opposed to an economic right as enshrined in traditional
copyright law.2 ‘Moral rights consecrate the idea that there is an intimate link between the
author and the work, because the work carries a personal imprint of the author.’3 Historically
these moral rights4 encompassed rights of integrity, paternity, disclosure and retraction,
giving artists control of how their work was utilised after sale. There was no economic return
*BBS, BCL Phd Candidate UCC.
1 Rita E Hauser, ‘French droit de suite The Pro blem of Protection for the Underprivileged Artist Under the
Copyright Law’ in Copyright Law Symposium 1, 24 (ASCAP Copyright Law Symposium Series No 11, 1962).
2 Henry Lydiate, ‘Artists Resale Right; Fourth Year Report’, (Artlaw, Art Monthly Magazine 2010), <
http://www.artquest.org.uk/articles/view/artists-resale-right-4th-year-report > accessed 2 0 February 2013.
3 Anne Latournerie, ‘International Perspectives on Moral Rights’ (SABIP Policy Panel Event, 23 rd March 2010)
< www.ipo.gov.uk/ipresearch-international-2010.pdf > accessed 20 February 2013.
4 These moral rights have their basis in the civil law tradition and it was not until the Berne Convention of 1928
that moral rights took on an international dimension and transcended their civil law origins. See ‘The Berne
Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works’, September 9, 1886 , as revised at Paris on July 24,
1971 and as amended Sept 28, 1979, 102 Stat 2853, 1161 UNTS 3, <
http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/berne/trtdocs_wo001.html#P174_33037 > a ccessed February 20 2013.
[2013] COLR
60
as the focus was on protecting the art and the artist’s reputation. Therefore, while the droit de
suite is often cited as a moral right, it is fundamentally different.
B DROIT DE SUITE IN THE EU
Albert Vaunois first introduced the concept of the droit de suite for visual artists in an article
published in the Chr onique de Pa ris in 1893.
5 A French attorney, Edouard Mack, then raised
the issue of the droit de suite in his 1896 report to the Berne Congress of the International
Literary and Artistic Association. The Société des Amis du Luxembourg were formed in
Paris in 1903 with the specific purpose of enacting the droit de suite into law. Its draft
proposal was issued one year later, serving as the basis for the French Act of 1920.6 Under
that law there were several exemptions to the right including the exclusion of private sales; it
was thought that this made collection of the royalty more practical as collecting societies
could engage in arrangements with galleries and auction houses.7 The right slowly spread for
a time across Europe with Belgium adopting the right in 1921,8 Czechoslovakia in 1926,9
Poland in 1935,10 Uruguay in 1937,11 and Italy in 1941. 12 The right was subsequently
adopted by the Brussels Conference of the Berne Convention in 1948.13 However it was not
until the block adoption by the EU fifty years later14 that the right gained some momentum.
In the EU a desire to remove distortions in the internal market gave impetus to the EU
Commission to investigate the merits of the droit de suite and consider whether the laws of
Member States should be harmonised so as to include the right. Following the EU
Commission Green Paper in 1995 it was decided to harmonise the law by implementing the
right.15 The Resale Right Directive came into effect on the 21st of September 2001.16
5 Albert Vaunois, ‘Chronique de Paris’, 25 Feb 1893, quoted in Liliane de Pierredon -Fawcett, The Droit de Suite
in Literary an d Artistic Proper ty, A Comparative Law Study (Louise-Martin Valiquette Translation), (New
York, Columbia University 1991).
6 Art 42 of Loi du 20 mai 1920 (1957 JO 2723).
7 ibid.
8 Law of 25 June 1921.
9 Law of 24 November 1926, art 35.
10 Law of 22 March 1935, modifying that of 29 March 1926.
11 Law of December 1937, art 9.
12 Law of 22 April 1941, arts 144-55.
13 ‘Brussels Conference on the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works’ (June
26th1948).
14 Council Directive 2001/84/EC, Official Journal L 272, 13/10/2001 P 0032 -0036.
15 Commission (EC), ‘Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society’ (Gree n Paper) COM(95) 382
final, 19 July 1995.
16 Council Directive (n 14).
To continue reading
Request your trial