The Estate of Andrew English. v

• Jurisdiction: Ireland
• Judgment Date: 30 January 1852
• Date: 30 January 1852
• Court: Queen's Bench Division (Ireland)

Queen's Bench

In the Matter of the Estate of ANDREW ENGLISH.

and

Crozier v. CrozierUNK 5 Ir. Eq. Rep. 415.

Jeff v. RobinsonENR 8 B. & C. 296.

Allen v. Allen.UNK 4 Ir. Eq. Rep. 472.

Barnacle v. NightingaleENR 14 Sim. 456.

Foster v. RomneyENR 11 East, 594.

Bevan v. WhiteUNK 7 Ir. Eq. Rep. 473.

Cook v. GerrardENR 1 Saund. 180.

Purefoy v. RogersENR 2 Saund. 380.

Frogmorton v. HolydayENR 3 Burr. 1618.

Morgan v. Griffiths Cowp. 235.

Wight v. CundallENR 9 East, 400.

Marshall v. Hill 2 M. & Sel. 608.

Toovey v. BassettENR 10 East, 460.

Spry v. BromfieldENR 7 M. & W. 545.

Robinson v. GrayENR 9 East, 1.

Driver v. FrankENR 6 Price, 41.

Fagge v. HeasemanENR Willes, 143.

Kirby v. O'HeaUNK 2 Ir. Eq. Rep. 424.

284 COMMON LAW REPORTS. H. T. 1852. Secondly-That the lease of the 23rd of June 1838 was a valid Queen's Bench execution of the power of leasing contained in the said settlement GREENS of the 19th of June 1830. v. O'REARNEY. P. C. CRAMPTON. L. PERRIN. R. MOORE. 31st January 1852. In the Matter of the Estate of ANDREW ENGLISH.* Jan. 30. R. M., being seised to him, THIS was a case sent from the Incumbered Estates Court for the his heirs, &e., of the lands of opinion of this Court. L. for a term of three lives, It stated that Richard Musgrave, of Littlebridge, in the county with covenant of Waterford, being seised to him, his heirs and assigns, of the lands for renewal, devised to R. of Littlebridge for a term of three lives, with a covenant for C. and his heirs all his perpetual renewal, devised the same in the terms following :-" I property, real and personal, " leave and bequeath to my grandson Richard Chearnley and his except as hereinafter " heirs for ever all my property, real and personal, of every kind, in excepted, and subject to all "Ireland and England, except as hereinafter excepted or otherwise his debts and legacies. He " disposed of, subject nevertheless to all my debts and legacies as also benuea h ed an annuity- " hereafter expressed." After a bequest of an annuity of 200 to to his wife, his wife, and a legacy of 50 to be paid to her by the said Richard and a legacy to be paid by Chearnley in one week after testator's decease, to buy mourning, and R. C., and a further legacy a further legacy to her of 500, as a token of testator's love and of 500, to be disposed of by regard, to be disposed of by her by her will to her grand-daugh her will to her grand-daugh- ters in such proportions as she should direct ; it then proceeded as ters, in such proportions as she should direct. Testator then bequeathed to A. E. his house and lands of L., in trust for his son R. E., together with the appurtenances, he not to commit waste, the said A. E. to remain and occupy the premises during his life, and then his son to succeed him ; and in case R. E. should die before his father, then A. E.'s second son, if...