The State (Attorney General) v Judge Roe
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | High Court |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1952 |
| Docket Number | (1949. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 S.S.) |
| Date | 01 January 1952 |
District Court - Return for trial of accused person - Evidence of return for trial - District Court Order - Signature of Justice affixed by means of a rubber stamp - Validity of signature - Purported copies of order not in existence offered to Court of trial as evidence of return for trial - Oral evidence of order returning accused for trial - Jurisdiction of Circuit Criminal Court to try accused person - Whether return for trial necessary - Certiorari - Mandamus - Petty Sessions Act, 1851 (14 15 Vict., c. 93), ss. 14, 15 - Courts of Justice Act, 1924 (No. 10 of 1924), ss. 27, 64, 77B - Courts of Justice Act, 1926 (No. 1 of 1926), s. 6 - Courts of Justice Act, 1936 (No. 48 of 1936), s. 62 - District Court Rules,1948 (Stat. R. O. 1947, No. 431), rr. 20, 23, 57 (1), 63 (2), 83, 84, 85.
Four men accused of certain criminal offences appeared before the Circuit Criminal Court in Clonmel and objectionwas then taken, on behalf of the first to be arraigned, to the Court proceeding with the trial on the grounds (inter alia):—1, that there was no evidence before the Court to show that...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Stephens v Governor of Castlerea Prison
...ACT 1999 S42 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1984 S4 MCDONAGH, STATE V FRAWLEY 1978 IR 131 DCR 1997 O.22 DCR 1997 O.22 r2(B) AG, STATE V JUDGE ROE 1951 IR 172 HAWK PC 8ED VOL 2 BOOK 2 CHAP 13 S15 CHITTY CRIMINAL LAW 2ED 1826 VOL 1 CHP 8 337 AG, STATE V JUDGE FAWSITT 1955 IR 39 DCR 1997 O.22 r2 OFFE......
-
People v McCormack
...that the District Justice's signature had been duly affixed by him to the order prevailed. The State (Attorney General) v. RoeIR [1951] I.R. 172 approved. 2. That the failure to transmit the order of the District Justice to the Circuit Court within the period prescribed by the Rules of 1967......
-
DPP v District Judge Elizabeth McGrath
...He cited, with approval, a passage from the judgment of Gavan Duffy P. in an earlier case, State (Attorney General) v. Judge Roe [1951] I.R. 172 (“ Roe”), to the effect that the range of contemplated interferences with statute law were shown by the use of two of the mildest nouns in the lan......
-
State (at the prosecution of John Clarke) v Maura Roche
...55 J.P. 310; 39 W.R. 171; 17 Cox, C.C. 187. Nelms v. Roe [1970] 1 W.L.R. 4; [1969] 3 All E.R. 1379. The State (Attorney General) v. Roe [1951] I.R. 172; (1952) 86 I.L.T.R. 91. The State (Lynch) v. Ballagh [1986] I.R. 203. D.P.P. v. Sheeran [1986] I.L.R.M. 579. The State (Gartlan) v. O'Donne......