The State (Irish Pharmaceutical Union) v Employment Appeals Tribunal
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judgment Date | 01 January 1987 |
Date | 01 January 1987 |
Court | Supreme Court |
Tribunal - Evidence - Determination of remedy by tribunal not argued by parties to hearing - Whether in breach of natural justice - Whether in breach of fair procedures.
Following an unfair dismissal hearing, the respondent Tribunal found that the employee had been unfairly dismissed and that the most appropriate remedy, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, was that the employee be re-engaged. The entire of the hearings had been confined to the circumstances of the dismissal and the financial loss arising therefrom. Neither employee nor employer, both of whom had been...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Eircell v Leitrim County Council
...701 KEEGAN, STATE V STARDUST VICTIMS COMPENSATION TRIBUNAL 1986 IR 642 IRISH PHARMACEUTICAL UNION, STATE V EMPLOYMENT APPEALS TRIBUNAL 1987 ILRM 36 DUFF V MANGAN GLEESON & DPP 1994 ILRM 91 ABENGLEN PROPERTIES LTD, STATE V DUBLIN CORP 1982 ILRM 590 BANE V GARDA REPRESENTATIVE ASSOC 1997 2 ......
-
Crofton Buildings Management CLG v an Bord Pleanála
...IR 241, at 264 139 [1973] IR 121 140 The State (Irish Pharmaceutical Union) v Employment Appeals Tribunal (Notice Party: Maria Dalton) [1987] I.L.R.M. 36 141 §6.1.65 142 for which proposition McCarthy J cited “a wealth of authority”: O'Brien v Bord na Móna [1983] IR 255; Loftus v The Attorn......
-
Tomasz Zalewski v The Workplace Relations Commission, an Adjudication Officer [Y], Ireland and the Attorney General
...crippling. Furthermore, this approach flies in the face of the principle established by this Court in The State (Irish Pharmaceutical Union) v Employment Appeals Tribunal [1987] ILRM 36 and see Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology v Employment Appeals Tribunal [2007] IEHC 210. Those cases ......
-
Dellway Investment Ltd and Others v National Asset Management Agency (NAMA) and Others
...& AG 1988 ILRM 89 1984/2/408 CONSTITUTION ART 40 RYAN v AG 1965 IR 294 IRISH PHARMACEUTICAL UNION, STATE v EMPLOYMENT APPEALS TRIBUNAL 1987 ILRM 36 1986/3/972 MCDONALD v BORD NA GCON & AG 1965 IR 217 FLANAGAN v UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN 1988 IR 724 1989 ILRM 469 1988/8/2214 DOUPE v LIMER......