Walsh v Walsh

• Jurisdiction: Ireland
• Judgment Date: 09 November 1848
• Date: 09 November 1848
• Court: Court of Chancery (Ireland)

Chancery.

WALSH

and

WALSH.

CASES IN EQUITY. 607 record, to use no harsher phrase; but it is not provided against; and I must therefore follow the decision of Vice-Chancellor Wigram (a) notwithstanding the doubts expressed by Vice-Chancellor Bruce (b). The weight to be given to the evidence is open to much observaÂtion, but I must admit it. The bill was afterwards dismissed, with costs. (a) Wood v. _Rot:Wife, 6 Hare, 183. (b) See Monday v. Guyer, 1 De G. & Sm. 188. WALSH v. WALSH. Nov. 9. M. M./LIMEY, for the plaintiff in this cause, asked for a receiver ; and a question incidentally arising in the argument, the Clerk in Court (Mr. Darley) stated the practice at the Rolls, on motions for extending receivers, to be to give notice to the debtor only, and not to the other parties who had appointed or previously extended the receiver, and that Counsel would be heard only for the party moving to extend the receiver and for the debtor. On motions to extend reÂceivers...