Attorney General v Simpson (No. 3)
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1964 |
| Docket Number | (No. 3). |
| Date | 01 January 1964 |
(S.C.)
Attorney-General
and
Simpson (No. 3)
Counsels' fees - Criminal charge - Case stated - Importance of case to defendant and to public - Case stated raising question of privilege of police witnesses - Factors to be considered by Taxing Master.
S. was charged with certain criminal offences in connection with the production of a play. During the course of the preliminary investigation in the District Court some of the police witnesses claimed privilege for certain written reports made by them and instructions received by them. This was challenged by the defence and the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Lavan v Walsh (No. 2)
...[1907] 1 I.R. 422, 434, Irish Independent Newspapers Ltd. v. Irish Press Ltd.IR[1939] I.R. 371; and Attorney-General v. SimpsonIRUNK[1963] I.R. 329, distinguished. 2. That the effect of O. 99, r. 12 of such Rules is that, where the incurring and the amounts of the costs were not expressly o......
-
Doyle v Deasy & Company Ltd & Guinness (Irl) Group Ltd
...3) 1996 3 IR 378 COURTS & COURT OFFICERS ACT 1995 S27(3) COMPETITION ACT 1991 SCH PAR 1(A)(1) COMPETITION (AMDT) ACT 1996 S9 AG V SIMPSON 1963 IR 329 TREASURY SOLICITOR V REGESTER 1978 2 AER 920 MIN FOR FINANCE V GOODMAN 1999 3 IR 333 SPRING & DESMOND V MIN FINANCE UNREP SMYTH 29.5.2000 2......
-
GASPARI v Iarnród Éireann
...HEARTY UNREP BARR 2.12.92 GALLAGHER SHATTER & CO, STATE V DEVALERA 1991 2 IR 198 RSC O.99 r38(3) BARRY V SPATE 1904 2 IR 478 AG V SIMPSON 1963 IR 329 SIMPSONS MOTOR SALES (LONDON) LTD V HENDON CORPORATION (NO 2) 1965 1 WLR 112 IRISH TRUST BANK LTD V CENTRAL BANK OF IRELAND 1976–1977 ILRM ......
-
Smyth v Tunney
...Limited, Gerard B. Coulter and Caroline Devine Defendants Cases mentioned in this report:— Attorney General v. Simpson (No. 3) [1963] I.R. 329. Conway v. Ní Mhainnin (Unreported, High Court, 2nd March, 1980, Finlay P.). Crotty v. An Taoiseach (No. 2) [1990] I.L.R.M. 617. Duan v. Freshford C......
Get Started for Free
