Lavan v Walsh (No. 2)
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judgment Date | 23 October 1967 |
Date | 23 October 1967 |
Court | High Court |
Review of taxation - Quantum of counsel's fees - Rules of the Superior Courts, 1962, O. 99, rr. 11, 12, 37, 38.
On a taxation of a bill of costs, between a solicitor and his client, the Taxing Master reduced the amounts of certain items claimed by the solicitor for counsel's fees. The solicitor's objection to the reductions were disallowed by the Taxing Master and the solicitor then applied to the High Court for an order to review the taxation of such items. It was not...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Costello v DPP
...& Co. FOR THE DEFENDANTS:- 10Brian Dempsey S.C. instructed by the Chief State Solicitor AUTHORITIES CITED:- 11Lavan -v- Walsh (No. 2) (1967) I.R. 129: 12Dunne -v- O'Neill (1974) I.R. 13Irish Trust Bank Limited -v- The Central Bank of Ireland (Parke J. 12thMarch, 1976). 14Kelly -v- Breen (Ha......
-
The Minister for Finance v Laurence Goodman, Goodman International and Subsidiary Companies (No. 2)
...v. Hoey (Unreported, High Court, Butler J., 2nd December, 1973). In re Kevin J. Walshe (1962) 96 I.L.T.R. 173. Lavan v. Walsh (No. 2) [1967] I.R. 129. M. & J. Gleeson v. Competition Authority [1999] 1 I.L.R.M. 401. Minister for Finance v. Flynn (Unreported, High Court, Carroll J., 9th Febru......
-
Minister for Finance v Goodman (& Others)
...of authority has emerged as to the proper approach to be adopted by this Court in applying those provisions. In Lavan -v- Walsh (No.2) [1967] IR. 129, Kenny J. compared rule 38(3) of Order 99 as contained in the 1962 Rules with the corresponding provisions which had been in force since 1893......
-
Kelly v Breen
...payable to a solicitor even where the Taxing Master has not (as in this case) proceeded on any incorrect principles. Lavan v. WalshIR [1967] I.R. 129; Dunne v. O'NeillIR [1974] I.R. 180 approved and applied. 5. Despite the fact that the Taxing Master in deciding the proper instruction fee p......