Irish Independent Newspapers, Ltd v Irish Press Ltd

JurisdictionIreland
Judgment Date11 July 1939
Date11 July 1939
CourtHigh Court
Irish Independent Newspapers
Limited
and
Irish Press
Limited

Taxation - Costs as between party and party - Refresher fees - Instructions for brief - Method of computing fee - Whether charges should be itemised for the purposes of taxation or amount allowed as a single item -Rules of the Supreme Court (Ir.), 1905, Or. LXV, r. 65 (3), (28), (44) - Rules of the High Court and Supreme Court, 1926, Appendix II.

On a motion to review the taxation of the costs of an action, objection was taken by the defendants to the sums allowed by the Taxing Master for instructions for brief and for refresher fees for counsel. The plaintiffs had contended before the Taxing Master that they had a right to require the particulars of instructions for brief to take the form of a succession of itemised charges, and to insist that, ontaxation, no fee could be allowed for anything done outside such itemised charges. Heldthat "instructions for brief" constituted a single item of charge, scheduled and taxable as such, and that the plaintiffs' claim to require a series of itemised charges and to insist on the disallowance of costs for any work not presented in that form was unsustainable. Accordingly the Taxing Master, who had yielded to their contention, had misdirected himself and the defendants' bill must be sent back to him for retaxation. Held also that the Court in Murray v. BurlingameDLTR, 46 I. L. T. R. 180, endorsed the view that the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Skoczylas v The Minister for Finance
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 17 January 2023
    ...expense…” The words quoted come from an extract from the Taxing Master's report in Irish Independent Newspapers Ltd v. Irish Press Ltd [1939] I.R. 371 at page 87 The following submission made by counsel for the defendant in Richards & Wallington (Plant Hire) Ltd v A Monk & Co Ltd, was accep......
  • Lavan v Walsh (No. 2)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 23 October 1967
    ...Taxing Master had erred in principle. Allison v. Jenkins [1907] 1 I.R. 422, 434, Irish Independent Newspapers Ltd. v. Irish Press Ltd.IR[1939] I.R. 371; and Attorney-General v. SimpsonIRUNK[1963] I.R. 329, distinguished. 2. That the effect of O. 99, r. 12 of such Rules is that, where the in......
  • Attorney General v Simpson (No. 3)
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1964

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT